[cisco-voip] VG202 vs ATA187

[Carlo]

I have found that the ATA187 works OK, the VG202 work better. 
With the ATA187, We only put 1 fax machine on it, had problems early on when it would receive faxes on both ports.
The one thing with the VG202s, it it will not plug and play with the voice vlan on a switch.

Also I have found that if you turn off "Error Correction Mode" (ECM) on the fax machines, your life will be much happer. On the big MFC machines, the tech will need to disable this.

Carlo

Sent from my iPad

> Good morning all,
> 
> We're looking at moving our fax machines to CUCM 9.1, but we do not have the need for a VG224, as it's only a few devices.
> 
> Other than the extra Ethernet port on a VG202, is there another reason I should be choosing that over an ATA187? Price-wise, the ATA187 is more attractive to us.
> 
> Thank you in advance,
> 
> Angel Castaneda
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130419/2d5ffdf2/attachment.html>