[cisco-voip] TAC question
Wes Sisk
wsisk at cisco.com
Wed Aug 14 14:14:14 EDT 2013
Hi Erick,
Please allow me to clarify - in that context I meant Cisco case management partners. That is subtly different from Cisco install/deploy/operate partners.
Regards,
Wes
On Aug 14, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com> wrote:
We aren't a partner. I understand that handing off the case is a bad idea since this team is relatively new to Cisco UC.
The disparity in responsiveness is my concern because I am not always available to work the issue.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
Erick,
We see very good performance, feedback, and stats from our partners. If there are specific concerns we'd really like to know.
Regarding opening a case and handing it off - how do you feel that plays out? For us it means we assume and approach CCIE caliber expertise and communication. We've seen some instances where non-CCIE's don't really speak the lingo and friction ensues.
-Wes
On Aug 14, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com> wrote:
Wondering if any of the Cisco guys could shed some light on a situation?
Guys on my team, non CCIE, non Partner, are getting thrid party 'engineers' when they open TAC cases and very poor service. Is this the norm now? When I open a case I get a 15 - 20 minute response time even on sev. 4 cases.
It's kind of goofy that in order to get a deccent TAC engineer I would have to open all of the cases and hand them off.
Thanks!
-E
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130814/0359cd92/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list