[cisco-voip] Calls via H.323 gateway displaying connected party instead of original dialed number

Florian Kroessbacher florian.kroessbacher at gmail.com
Mon Aug 19 09:16:54 EDT 2013


hy i will check on our routers for sip, and update you

    --
Florian Kroessbacher
gmail: florian.kroessbacher at gmail.com

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Justin Steinberg <jsteinberg at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Is there a similar command for SIP ?
> I was not able to figure out a way to do this with SIP last time I tried.
> On Aug 19, 2013 1:59 AM, "Dana Tong" <Dana_Tong at bridgepoint.com.au> wrote:
>>  Awesome. That’s great thanks. Just what we were after.****
>>
>>
>> Cheers****
>>
>> Dana****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Florian Kroessbacher [mailto:florian.kroessbacher at gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, 19 August 2013 3:23 PM
>> *To:* Dana Tong
>> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Calls via H.323 gateway displaying connected
>> party instead of original dialed number****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> hy****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> have you tried this on h323 gw****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> voice service voip ****
>>
>> no supplementary-service h225-notify cid-update ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> --
>> Florian Kroessbacher
>> gmail: florian.kroessbacher at gmail.com****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Dana Tong <Dana_Tong at bridgepoint.com.au>
>> wrote:****
>>
>>  Good morning,****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Would anyone have a quick fix for this problem. ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Outbound calls via a H.323 gateway show the connected party instead of the
>> original dialled number.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Have tried setting the “*Always Display Original Dialed Number*” to True
>> on the Service Parameters but doesn’t keep for transferred calls. ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> It also screws up the display for extension to extension transfers. Ie
>> 7123 calls 7122 who transfers to 7190 but it shows 7122 on the calling
>> party.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Is there something on the voice gateway that could be sending the caller
>> id back to CUCM? This was an upgrade to the CUCM but I have not made any
>> other changes to the configuration of the voice gateways.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> Cheers****
>>
>> Dana****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>>  ** **
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130819/2c5dd969/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list