[cisco-voip] Calling Party Transformation Patterns on CUCM 8.x

[Scott Voll]

Can you just set it on the line and pass it through to the sip trunk?

Scott


On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:38 AM, <Zoltan.Kelemen at emerson.com> wrote:

> Hi and a Happy New Year!****
>
> ** **
>
> CUCM 8.5.1 and I’m trying to globalize calling numbers of outgoing calls
> on a specific SIP trunk.****
>
> ** **
>
> My problem is, there are more than one DID ranges, i.e.:****
>
> 1XXX numbers would have +40 345 671 XXX****
>
> 2XXX numbers would have +40 341 232 XXX****
>
> ** **
>
> I want to make sure to set the proper caller ID/calling number on outgoing
> calls. (I can do that since it’s an internal SIP trunk, so any callerID is
> ok)****
>
> ** **
>
> So I’ve created a partition and a CSS for transformations and added a
> Calling Party Transformation Pattern (Call Routing > Transformation >
> Transformation Pattern > Calling Party Transformation Pattern), applied it
> properly to the SIP trunk etc.****
>
> ** **
>
> For testing I have created a single test pattern, with my own extension:
> 2356****
>
> This matched and applied the transformations I was expecting. I tested it
> with changing the transformations, it kept working.****
>
> ** **
>
> However, when I rewrote the pattern to 2XXX it stopped matching. Basically
> it seems that I’m unable to use any non-specific pattern to match the
> calling party number. (neither 2!, nor 235X nor anything else that I’ve
> tried seems to match)****
>
> ** **
>
> Any ideas?****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> *Zoltan Kelemen**
> *Emerson****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130103/5f6499fe/attachment.html>