[cisco-voip] prefix digits for outbound calls

[Erick Wellnitz]

Excellent explanation.  I knew I was missing some sort of logic in the
processing.


On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Divin John (dijohn) <dijohn at cisco.com>wrote:

>  Erick,
>
>  It's Route-Pattern < Routelist/RouteGroup < Gateway
>
>  If you have transformations at RP and Route-list/RG level, RL/RG takes
> precedence. CUCM ignores the edits at RP level.
> If you have transformations at RP, RL/RG and Gateway level, Gateway trumps
> everything else. So, we ignore RP and RL/RG level transformations.
>
>
>  Regards,
> Divin
>
>
>   From: Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, 17 July 2013 8:52 PM
> To: cisco-voip <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [cisco-voip] prefix digits for outbound calls
>
>   I'm seeing some odd behavior in my route lists for prefixing digits.
>
> If I prefix digits at the route pattern level everything works fine.  If I
> try to prefix digits at the route list level (on each route group assigned
> to the route list) the digits are not prefixed.
>
> My pattern is 9011.44XXXXXXXXXX
> I strip predot on the route pattern then I prefix + and the call routes
> over our sip trunk as expected.
>
> If I strip predot on the route pattern and prefix + at the RL level the +
> is not prefixed and the call fails.
>
> My educated guess is that perhaps I should not strip predot at the pattern
> level nad instead do it at the RL level.
>
> I am unable to do much testing until close of business.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130718/f4a5c9cd/attachment.html>