[cisco-voip] snmp traps on voice gateways

Erick Wellnitz ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com
Mon Jun 10 10:24:34 EDT 2013


I have a mix of MGCP and H323.

I know I can't get any layer 3 info from the MGCP PRIs.

The real issue is our SNMP monitoring system.  It is less than
sophisticated and we must push traps to it.  It cannot poll the router like
most good monitoring systems can.


On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com> wrote:

> How is the PRI gateway configured?  H323/SIP/MGCP, etc.  Google should
> come back with this topic, if not Cisco Support Community has several
> threads.****
>
> ** **
>
> With H323 you get a trap every time a channel goes down (eg every call).
> I recall using Syslog and parsing the PRi  for channel 23  (d-channel)
> versus the channels or pulling another MIB verus the interface status.
> RTMT also has some alerting options versus SNMP.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Friday, June 07, 2013 4:54 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] snmp traps on voice gateways****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> I admit, I am not the best with SNMP. I have been going through the
> different SNMP settings for 28xx/29xx gateways.    I didn't see any SNMP
> traps for PRI/T1 interfaces, which until we start migrating to a SIP
> solution is important for us to monitor and alert if a PRI goes down.****
>
>  ****
>
> Has anyone configured their gateways to send traps for PRI interaces
> before?  ****
>
>
>
> itevomcid ****
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130610/752ab6f5/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list