[cisco-voip] 2xBRI vs 4xFXO at remote site

[Ahmed Maher]

BRI is better than FXO (if ur PSTN has issues in supervisory disconnect with FXO) but BRI configuration may be more complex than FXO and even PRI

 

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 6:46 PM
To: Cisco VoIP List
Subject: [cisco-voip] 2xBRI vs 4xFXO at remote site

 


Any thoughts on 2xBRI vs 4xFXO at a remote site? I'm road mapping our telephony infrastructure and would like to propose a scenario whereby we remove our PRI connectivity at the remote sites and have a few lines for emergency inbound/outbound calling. I like the simplicity of the digital PRI interfaces and I'm assuming the same would be of the BRI options.

Experiences, good or bad, would be great to hear. 

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it. 
                              - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130321/0ed9c749/attachment.html>