[cisco-voip] 2xBRI vs 4xFXO at remote site

[Scott Voll]

For Caller ID alone I would take the BRI over FXO.  then factor in the
Disconnect issues.

Not sure if BRI is available everywhere.  Might check with local Telco.

YMMV

Scott


On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

>
> Any thoughts on 2xBRI vs 4xFXO at a remote site? I'm road mapping our
> telephony infrastructure and would like to propose a scenario whereby we
> remove our PRI connectivity at the remote sites and have a few lines for
> emergency inbound/outbound calling. I like the simplicity of the digital
> PRI interfaces and I'm assuming the same would be of the BRI options.
>
> Experiences, good or bad, would be great to hear.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130321/3feaa3d8/attachment.html>