[cisco-voip] Call Forward All With Line/Device CSS
Scott Voll
svoll.voip at gmail.com
Wed May 1 16:43:16 EDT 2013
it was the carrier rewriting the CLID.
As my present job, they had ALI for every DN. The problem became EM and
people moving from site to site, so we ended up with CER to deal with that.
But for your solution, so long as people are not moving from site to site,
that might be an option.
YMMV
Scott
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Tim Kenyon <tim at conveyant.com> wrote:
> I am designing on the fly, so I would go with the assumption that I
> either have PS-ALI set or I would use a service bureau and route all my
> calls out to someone like 911ETC with the proper ELIN that I want to
> define, route all 911 calls out a single SIP trunk to their data center and
> they would position the call back into the carrier network at the right
> location.****
>
> ** **
>
> Trying to develop a solution to replace CER.****
>
> ** **
>
> So, was YOUR system rewriting as the billing number or the carrier was
> automatically when you sent the call? Like I said, I want to send a
> specific ANI for the device when it dials 911 that is relevant to the
> location of the device, not their actual DID.****
>
> ** **
>
> Tim****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 01, 2013 1:58 PM
> *To:* Tim Kenyon
> *Cc:* Francisco Fossa; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Call Forward All With Line/Device CSS****
>
> ** **
>
> depends on your setup. if you have a PS-ALI contract or not. for my
> previous employer, it got re-wrote as the billing number since there was
> not contract. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Scott****
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Tim Kenyon <tim at conveyant.com> wrote:****
>
> Were you able to correct the outbound ANI (ELIN) to be representative of
> the location of the device dialing 911 instead of just that individuals
> actual DID number?****
>
> ****
>
> Tim****
>
> ****
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Scott Voll
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 01, 2013 9:58 AM
> *To:* Francisco Fossa
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Call Forward All With Line/Device CSS****
>
> ****
>
> in my previous job, without CER, we used the Device CSS for 911 to the
> local VGW, then used the Line CSS for what access they got. That way if
> they had EM you still had the correct 911 routing, but could limit or allow
> Calling based on the line.****
>
> ****
>
> YMMV****
>
> ****
>
> Scott****
>
> ****
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Francisco Fossa <franciscofossa at gmail.com>
> wrote:****
>
> Hi
> This is my first post for the list, so please be gentle... I am still
> unsure on how to use this, it has been a while since I've been using
> real mailing lists.
> On Arrasmith problem: What about moving 911 to Null PT... specially if
> it's only in the US, you can then use your CSS for forwarding too.
>
> Regards
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130501/9bbe00dd/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list