[cisco-voip] Recommended SIP SBC

[randal k]

I can only speak to the Sansay so far, but it has an excellent SOAP XML API
that is very full featured.

Randal


On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Heim, Dennis <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com> wrote:

> DO any of the SBC’s out there have a good API?****
>
> ** **
>
> *Dennis Heim | **Sr. Unified Collaboration Team Lead & Solution Architect
> *****
>
> World Wide Technology | 314.212.1814 | dennis.heim at wwt.com**
>
> “Creating Impact, Ignition & Scalability”****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *randal k
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 15, 2013 1:57 PM
> *To:* Cisco VOIP
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Recommended SIP SBC****
>
> ** **
>
> I too have been trying to get a software-only eval of Acme and have been
> stonewalled by an unresponsive sales team. Sonus has been OK but a bit
> slow. Sansay, on the other hand, has been very responsive and has
> aggressive pricing, a good UI and a solid feature set, although they are
> small.
>
> We are also in the ~150-200 concurrent session land -- too small for huge,
> too big to use open-everything -- and believe that the "virtual SBC"
> concept is incredibly hot and we *really* want it ... but ... it's really
> hard to get. Everyone wants to sell a box (sansay/sonus), just isn't
> selling anything (acme), or has targeted virtual SBC at huge networks
> instead of small (metaswitch).****
>
> Let me know how it goes for you!****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Robert Kulagowski <rkulagow at gmail.com>
> wrote:****
>
> [Sorry for breaking the thread, but original message is gone.]
>
> Other than Acme Packet, has anyone else deployed something like a
> Sonus? The merger with Oracle seems to be slowing things down over
> there, and I may not be able to get equipment from the Demo Depot
> until after they're done merging, and in the 3 weeks since our meeting
> the AP sales guy still hasn't gotten me a copy of the "software only"
> SBC to even start an eval even though I keep pestering him.
>
> Something that can do 200 simultaneous sessions is what we're looking
> for, G.711, no fancy transcoding required.
>
> I found a SBC comparison report, but it's $3400, so a bit expensive,
> but the executive summary put Sonus as their choice.
>
> If you have experience with multiple SBCs and can go into why one and
> not another then that's an added bonus.
>
> Thanks.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130515/2128fb42/attachment.html>