[cisco-voip] CUBE design consideration

[Ed Leatherman]

Ahmed,




I can't comment on Cube, but maybe another product to review, I think cisco's expressway product might do some similar things. 




http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/ps7060/ps11305/ps11315/ps11337/data_sheet_c78-697073.html

—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone

On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Ahmed -Y <yhameed81 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
> I have few questions and really thankful if you answer them.
> Currently softphones from customers registered directly with shared UC
> infrastructure (cucm, unity, presence etc). Now we are planning to deploy
> some kinda gateway device and softphones from customer must
> register/terminate on it before reach to UC infra. This gateway device must
> hide the internal network and protect any potential attacks. Any advice
> please.
> 1) I read about cube. I provide topology hiding and protection but question
> is can softphones like jabber or movi be terminated on cube and then cube
> initiate separate call leg to cucm?
> 2) I understood cube hide topology using NAPT (nat), could there be any
> issues by enabling nat base hiding?
> Regards
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131109/8fad44c8/attachment.html>