[cisco-voip] CUCM 9.x ELM and Owner ID

[Tim Smith]

Thanks Joe,

I have seen that one before, I'm not sure that is the same issue.

This is in regard to the physical phones not been allocated to a user. (i.e. assigning phones owner ID's)

This seems to cause a double up for me when I create CSF profiles.

Cheers,

Tim

From: Joe Martini [mailto:joemar2 at cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 October 2013 10:08 AM
To: Tim Smith
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 9.x ELM and Owner ID

Versions of CUCM that contain the fix for CSCue14471 no longer have this issue.
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCue14471

Joe

On Oct 7, 2013, at 6:00 PM, Tim Smith <tim.smith at enject.com.au<mailto:tim.smith at enject.com.au>> wrote:

Hi guys,

I've seen some discussion on this already
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/voip/172472?search_string=owner%20cuwl;#172472

Most clients do not assign owner ID as they use extension mobility.
(I will admit it is true that a lot of mobility users actually stay logged into the same phone and we could technically assign them as the owner)

Either way, I keep ending up with my licensing in ELM being out of balance due to having phones and CSF's.

The TAC answer to me was that I should assign an owner ID.

Am I missing something here? Is there another solution?

Cheers,

Tim.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131007/8beb47a9/attachment.html>