[cisco-voip] 9.1.2 'owner' field

[Erick Wellnitz]

That's what I suspected.  It is like leaving owner user id blank in
previous versions.

I hesitate to go to licensing to adjust license counts to accomodate our EM
environment but then again I don't want to have to assign a user ID to 4000
phones either.  Both have the potential to turn ugly.


On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Matthew Loraditch <
MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:

>  Not sure where the documentation is right now, but it ties devices to
> users if a device has an owner defined then all the devices that have that
> user as owner get added up and determined if they user is using
> essential/basic/enhanced/enhanced+/cuwl std/cuwl pro****
>
> If the field is set to anonymous then the  device type is looked up and
> matched to essential/basic/enhanced.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA, CCDA
>
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
> Timonium, MD 21093
>
> voice. 410.252.8830
> fax.  410.252.9284
>
> Twitter <http://twitter.com/heliontech>  |  Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296>
> | Website <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>  |  Email Support<support at heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 23, 2013 11:10 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] 9.1.2 'owner' field****
>
> ** **
>
> My google-fu must be off.****
>
>  ****
>
> Can anyone point me to documentation for CCUCM 9.1.2 that describes how
> the new 'Owner' phone configuration item impacts licensing?****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131023/9e36fcd7/attachment.html>