[cisco-voip] e164 Dialplan & UC Application Version Support

[Nate VanMaren]

CUC is fine with + in 9+

But why would you do a new deployment in something older than 9?  Just for the license changes I would hate to post pone the inevitable.


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Heim, Dennis
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 11:54 AM
To: Boon; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] e164 Dialplan & UC Application Version Support

UCCX does not support the +. CUC only supports the plus on alternative extensions.

What is CUACP?

Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814

PS Engineering:  Innovate & Ignite.


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Boon
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 1:51 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] e164 Dialplan & UC Application Version Support

I'm looking to use + dialing in my next customer dialplan design.

Could anyone tell me if there are any restrictions with deploying e164 with + dialing for the following application versions:
CUACP 9.1
CUCM 8.6
CUC 8.6
UCCX 8.5
CUPS 8.6

Thanks


 NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131031/f2bc4e7b/attachment.html>