[cisco-voip] UC on UCS
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Thu Sep 5 11:04:53 EDT 2013
yes, i tried that tool as well. got the same answer (on my side, and the other side).
i have a sneaking suspicion, they didn't like my answer because I was using two C260-M2s. they came back and told me to use 4 C240-M3s. i really liked the C260 and only having to deal with two boxes, one in each data centre. plus, it was a bit cheaper, and when i asked at Live 2012, I was told (with obvious caveats) that a C260-M3 would likely come down the line as well.
i believe the bigger boxes like the C260 are off the TRC roadmap and there will only be mid-size boxes like the C240, everything else is pushing towards the blade infrastructure.
so they were likely trying to do me a favour. ;)
salt, grain, etc.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Data Centre and Communications Facilities
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph
519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
lelio at uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Loraditch" <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 10:56:05 AM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] UC on UCS
The docwiki is described as authoritative by the various partner resources who participate in our partner online community.
I also recommend looking at the new sizing tool: http://tools.cisco.com/ucs/
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitter | Facebook | Website | Email Support
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 10:41 AM
To: Scott Voll
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UC on UCS
I think you'll find the proverbial, "it depends" is the answer.
The wiki doc starts here:
http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Communications_Virtualization_Sizing_Guidelines#General_Rules_for_Co-residency_and_Physical.2FVirtual_Hardware_Sizing
You'll have to get your apps lined up and see which ones have what rules.
But I have a feeling, that this doc wiki, as updated as it may be, sometimes is not "authoritative". I had an interesting discussion with my SE as far as how many VMs I could run on one UCS chassis. I read the doc, came up with a plan, and word came back, both from the SE and from his support team that my design was over provisioned. I'm pushing back, asking them why if all I did was read the documentation and sized it accordingly. Never got a good explanation as to why the conflict.
Good luck.
Lelio
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Data Centre and Communications Facilities
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph
519 ‐ 824 ‐ 4120 Ext 56354
lelio at uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
From: "Scott Voll" < svoll.voip at gmail.com >
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 10:27:08 AM
Subject: [cisco-voip] UC on UCS
Can someone point me to the correct documentation that says that either I CAN or I CAN'T run other 3rd party apps on the same blade as my UC stuff?
I've had conflicting reports but have no solid information on the support of this configuration.
One report I got said I could if I was using Nexus 1000v to support QoS.
Yet others have been it's not supported due to CPU and Ram concerns.
ultimately I want a TAC supported system, but need to factor in cost.
TIA
Scott
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130905/1bffae4f/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list