[cisco-voip] Prefix for Missed Calls

[Ed Leatherman]

Had to get through a couple layers of support to find someone that knew what I wanted, but they aren't able to set the plan type; will just look at working it manually per the docs

—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Mike <mikeeo at msn.com> wrote:

> Ed,
>  
> If you do a Q931 debug and see the carrier not setting ISDN type correctly you can call the carrier. If that doesn’t work just use translation patterns on the router to set the correct type.
>  
> Remember this all goes out the window once you move to SIP. I know just about all SIP carriers in the US require 11 digit dialing so just add 91 or +1 to all incoming calls.
>  
> From: Ed Leatherman [mailto:ealeatherman at gmail.com] 
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 8:21 AM
> To: Mike
> Cc: Cisco VOIP
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Prefix for Missed Calls
>  
> Mike, thanks for posting that link, good explanation; makes me want to clean up the dial plan on our own systems a bit.
>  
> Is it a common situation for service providers to just set all calls as "National" in the US now? I wasn't able to observe any international calls coming in so perhaps those come in with the correct type - but local calls definitely show up for me as national.
>  
>  
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Mike <mikeeo at msn.com> wrote:
> This is done by using transformation patterns.
>  
> Start with this link and read all 3 parts.
> http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2009/12/07/building-global-dial-plans-in-cucm7-part-i-globalization/
>  
> If you need help let me know.
>  
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lisa Notarianni
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:31 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Prefix for Missed Calls
>  
> (Call Manager 8.6.6)
>  
> Has anyone ever successfully utilized translation patterns to prefix 91 so that when Dial is pressed in Missed or Received Calls, it will automatically populate the 91 for calls that were missed or received from outside of network callers?
>  
> We had done some testing but it caused an overlap in route patterns which therefore caused a timeout delay for internal calling.
>  
> Here is what we built:
>  
> {2-9]xx xxx xxxx would automatically add 91 prefix
> [2-9]xxx Is for internal calling
>  
> If an internal call was made for example to 4357,  Call Manager would wait to see if the caller was done dialing and after about 15 seconds it would time out and then the call would go through.  The system was comparing the 2 route patterns above and was not sure which was being used which caused the delay.
>  
> I know there are other suggested ways of accomplishing this but if there is a workaround to Cisco’s preferred way of showing 91 prefix on each incoming call we would rather that.
> Thank you in advance.
> Lisa
> LisaNotarianniSignature
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>  
> -- 
> Ed Leatherman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130918/cb2fb724/attachment.html>