[cisco-voip] is there a requirement/recommendation to apply 9.1(2)SU1 patch to standalone ELM host

[Matthew Loraditch]

I’ve not heard of any major or minor ELM related bugs so it wouldn’t hurt but may not do anything either. You could also just skip to PLM. I know I’ve seen you are doing most of your stuff physical still, but if you have got that virtual you will be set for 10x whenever you are ready.

Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093

direct voice. 443.541.1518
fax.  410.252.9284

Twitter<http://twitter.com/heliontech>  |  Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296>  | Website<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>  |  Email Support<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
Support Phone. 410.252.8830


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 3:33 PM
To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)
Subject: [cisco-voip] is there a requirement/recommendation to apply 9.1(2)SU1 patch to standalone ELM host


Just reading through the release notes for 9.1(2)SU1 and it has no mention of stand alone ELM hosts. I know that stand alone ELM hosts are a new (and dying) breed, but we'd still like to proceed with it for now.

Any thoughts on this?

Lelio

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs>
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140205/98d1e9ca/attachment.html>