[cisco-voip] OT: WAN Technology

[Dana Tong]

Do companies in the States use a single IPWAN service providers?

The reason why I ask, is that in Australia, many companies use a single provider for a Private MPLS IPWAN. (a lot only have single access).
With this in mind, the legacy Locations-based CAC seems to be more appropriate for CUCM Call CAC.

Do you guys go ahead and configure your links /pipes using the eCAC model? Or would you stick with a legacy/ traditional approach for CAC?

Cheers
D

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ed Leatherman
Sent: Friday, 21 February 2014 6:48 AM
To: Matthew Loraditch
Cc: cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT: WAN Technology

One or two still for some remote places but I don't think they will be around much longer.

Matt is right, they took FR off of the ccie route/switch and put in DMVPN.

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>> wrote:
We use various combinations of MPLS, DMVPN, and Layer 2 WAN Services at our clients.  I have a very few dedicated Point to Point T1s left and no frame relay.
I think I heard they actually took frame off of the latest R+S CCIE revision.


Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093

direct voice. 443.541.1518<tel:443.541.1518>
fax.  410.252.9284<tel:410.252.9284>

Twitter<http://twitter.com/heliontech>  |  Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296>  | Website<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>  |  Email Support<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
Support Phone. 410.252.8830<tel:410.252.8830>


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>] On Behalf Of Erick Wellnitz
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:14 PM
To: cisco-voip
Subject: [cisco-voip] OT: WAN Technology

Kind of off topic but I've been wondering...

Does anyone still use frame relay or has MPLS type of connectivity pretty much replaced it?

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



--
Ed Leatherman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140220/ee156ea0/attachment.html>