[cisco-voip] OT: WAN Technology

[Ed Leatherman]

One or two still for some remote places but I don't think they will be
around much longer.

Matt is right, they took FR off of the ccie route/switch and put in DMVPN.


On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Matthew Loraditch <
MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:

>  We use various combinations of MPLS, DMVPN, and Layer 2 WAN Services at
> our clients.  I have a very few dedicated Point to Point T1s left and no
> frame relay.
>
> I think I heard they actually took frame off of the latest R+S CCIE
> revision.
>
>
>
>
>
> Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
>
> 1965 Greenspring Drive
> Timonium, MD 21093
>
> direct voice. 443.541.1518
> fax.  410.252.9284
>
> Twitter <http://twitter.com/heliontech>  |  Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296>
> | Website <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>  |  Email Support<support at heliontechnologies.com?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
>
> Support Phone. 410.252.8830
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Erick Wellnitz
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:14 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] OT: WAN Technology
>
>
>
> Kind of off topic but I've been wondering...
>
>
>
> Does anyone still use frame relay or has MPLS type of connectivity pretty
> much replaced it?
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


-- 
Ed Leatherman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140220/d198e235/attachment.html>