[cisco-voip] cisco-voip Digest, Vol 125, Issue 5

Mohammed Irshad mohammed.irshad at outlook.com
Fri Mar 7 10:30:46 EST 2014 

Dear All,


I have centralize CUCM Cluster with 40+ Branches with their respective
Branch DP's & regions  using g729 Codec  default video bit codec i.e. 384
and the  Cisco IP Phones  8945 register to CUCM cluster using WAN 1mb MPLS
link, when I have 2 video calls at the same time  between Branch and HQ
video  is getting distorted, please help what should I do.

Regards
Irshad

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 8:00 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 125, Issue 5

Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
	cisco-voip at puck.nether.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	cisco-voip-request at puck.nether.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	cisco-voip-owner at puck.nether.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade	from
      v7 to v9? (Heim, Dennis)
   2. Re: Setting up ICM Sprawler 8.x (Pavan K)
   3. Re: should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade	from
      v7 to v9? (Lelio Fulgenzi)
   4. Re: Setting up ICM Sprawler 8.x (Ryan Burtch)
   5. Re: Setting up ICM Sprawler 8.x (Beck, Christopher)
   6. Re: should I rebuild cluster from scratch after	upgrade	from
      v7 to v9? (Madziarczyk, Jonathan)
   7. Re: UCCX High CPU & Memory Usage (Anthony Holloway)
   8. Re: should I rebuild cluster from scratch after	upgrade	from
      v7 to v9? (Lelio Fulgenzi)
   9. Re: Directory URI in LDAP sync (Anthony Holloway)
  10. FAX and ITSP SIP Trunks and CUBE (Dana Tong)
  11. Re: FAX and ITSP SIP Trunks and CUBE (Jason Aarons (AM))
  12. CUCM 10 Phones (Leslie Meade)
  13. Re: CUCM 10 Phones (James Buchanan)
  14. Re: CUCM 10 Phones (Matthew Collins)
  15. Re: CUCM 10 Phones (Jason Aarons (AM))
  16. Re: CUCM 10 Phones (Daniel Pagan)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:37:24 -0600
From: "Heim, Dennis" <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, cisco-voip voyp list
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after
	upgrade	from v7 to v9?
Message-ID:
	<0CC57FCAB07CEB4595526952471493D360D2283407 at PRODCMS1.wwt.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Aligned partitions.

Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc.
| 314-212-1814

PS Engineering:  Innovate & Ignite.


From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 10:56 AM
To: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade
from v7 to v9?


I have an opportunity (maybe, if time permits) to rebuild an off-line
cluster after I upgrade it from v7 to v9.

The question is, is there any advantage to building a cluster from scratch
and restore from DRS, so that it is built from v9 installation media rather
than from a v7 upgrade?

I recall seeing a number of bugs in the past that said something to the
effect of "...if installation was an upgrade, disk space, etc. etc...."

Can anything thing of any advantages of doing this? This will help us test
our disaster recovery process as well.

Lelio

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph

519?824?4120 Ext 56354
lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs>
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140305/3100999a/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 00:08:39 +0530
From: Pavan K <pav.ccie at gmail.com>
To: Ryan Burtch <rburtch3 at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up ICM Sprawler 8.x
Message-ID:
	<CAJDPBuUGN6s7sSAD_2NG6n7QQe3SQeKZsJz+cF9z=DvE977knA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

AD /DNS is usually on a separate box
You need SQL anywhere on the logger / aw/HDS/dds boxes. So yes you will need
SQL.
On Mar 5, 2014 1:03 AM, "Ryan Burtch" <rburtch3 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a couple questions on the ICM Sprawler setup.
>
> 1. Does SQL need to be installed on the Sprawler?
> 2. Can AD/DNS be installed on the Sprawler?
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Ryan Burtch
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140306/b6028baf/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:44:07 -0500 (EST)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: Dennis Heim <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com>
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after
	upgrade	from v7 to v9?
Message-ID:
	<1785489408.1667972.1394045047581.JavaMail.root at uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Thanks Dennis. I believe that 'aligned partitions' are a VM issue only? I am
currently on MCS (HP equiv) servers. 

Lelio 



---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 

519?824?4120 Ext 56354
lelio at uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Dennis Heim" <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "cisco-voip voyp list"
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 1:37:24 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after
upgrade from v7 to v9? 



Aligned partitions. 


Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration) World Wide Technology, Inc.
| 314-212-1814 

PS Engineering: Innovate & Ignite. 




From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 10:56 AM
To: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade
from v7 to v9? 



I have an opportunity (maybe, if time permits) to rebuild an off-line
cluster after I upgrade it from v7 to v9. 

The question is, is there any advantage to building a cluster from scratch
and restore from DRS, so that it is built from v9 installation media rather
than from a v7 upgrade? 

I recall seeing a number of bugs in the past that said something to the
effect of "...if installation was an upgrade, disk space, etc. etc...." 

Can anything thing of any advantages of doing this? This will help us test
our disaster recovery process as well. 

Lelio 



---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 

519 ? 824 ? 4120 Ext 56354
lelio at uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140305/3e291aa5/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:41:17 -0500
From: Ryan Burtch <rburtch3 at gmail.com>
To: Pavan K <pav.ccie at gmail.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up ICM Sprawler 8.x
Message-ID:
	<CAK+Shf7XiimgU2OOit8AwLo9KYqPGL6aA8PLknjGgLEoD0C6tA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

This is for a Sprawler.  Do you have any experience setting one of these up?




Sincerely,

Ryan Burtch


On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Pavan K <pav.ccie at gmail.com> wrote:

> AD /DNS is usually on a separate box
> You need SQL anywhere on the logger / aw/HDS/dds boxes. So yes you 
> will need SQL.
> On Mar 5, 2014 1:03 AM, "Ryan Burtch" <rburtch3 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  I have a couple questions on the ICM Sprawler setup.
>>
>> 1. Does SQL need to be installed on the Sprawler?
>> 2. Can AD/DNS be installed on the Sprawler?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Ryan Burtch
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140305/c4169e36/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:12:53 -0600
From: "Beck, Christopher" <CBeck at usg.com>
To: Ryan Burtch <rburtch3 at gmail.com>, "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net"
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up ICM Sprawler 8.x
Message-ID:
	<AF8E5A5BA2DF074E8B46A3B4A8BC265503160225D4 at CERO-MB-01.USG.NET>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Pavan is right.   You will need SQL because the router/logger processes are
on the server.  If you install the AW/HDS service on a different host, that
will require SQL as well.  You will need separate server(s) for the AD/DNS.
It isn't supported as a function installed on the IPCC servers.


It doesn't matter if you have a sprawler or a multi-server production setup,
these rules apply.

Hope it helps,
Chris

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Ryan Burtch
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:41 PM
To: Pavan K
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Setting up ICM Sprawler 8.x

This is for a Sprawler.  Do you have any experience setting one of these up?




Sincerely,

Ryan Burtch

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Pavan K
<pav.ccie at gmail.com<mailto:pav.ccie at gmail.com>> wrote:

AD /DNS is usually on a separate box
You need SQL anywhere on the logger / aw/HDS/dds boxes. So yes you will need
SQL.
On Mar 5, 2014 1:03 AM, "Ryan Burtch"
<rburtch3 at gmail.com<mailto:rburtch3 at gmail.com>> wrote:
I have a couple questions on the ICM Sprawler setup.

1. Does SQL need to be installed on the Sprawler?
2. Can AD/DNS be installed on the Sprawler?




Sincerely,

Ryan Burtch

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Confidentiality Notice: This email is intended for the sole use of the
intended
 recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged
information.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use,
review,  dissemination, copying or action taken based on this message or its
attachments,  if any, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the  sender by reply email and destroy or delete all copies
of the original message  and any attachments. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140305/0fff46a4/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 14:31:09 -0600
From: "Madziarczyk, Jonathan" <jmad at cityofevanston.org>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after
	upgrade	from v7 to v9?
Message-ID:
	
<C5450ABE05E1F246B2C0AFB201106EC922548443 at Coe-MS1.local.cityofevanston.org>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Yes, I believe the aligned partitions issue is VMware specific.

 

I don?t know what Cisco has to say about it, but I always feel better
knowing the install was direct from a fresh 9 install rather than a 7->9
upgrade.  Since the DRS backup and restore from an upgraded 9x onto a fresh
9x is acceptable in the Jump Upgrade in VMware I don?t see a problem with it
on the physical side.

 

On a side note, are you using any ATAs?

 

 

 

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:44 PM
To: Dennis Heim
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after
upgrade from v7 to v9?

 

Thanks Dennis. I  believe that 'aligned partitions' are a VM issue only? I
am currently on MCS (HP equiv) servers.

Lelio



---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph

519?824?4120 Ext 56354
lelio at uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

 

________________________________

From: "Dennis Heim" <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "cisco-voip voyp list"
<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 1:37:24 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after
upgrade        from v7 to v9?

Aligned partitions.

 

Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)

World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814

 

PS Engineering:  Innovate & Ignite.

 

 

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 10:56 AM
To: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade
from v7 to v9?

 


I have an opportunity (maybe, if time permits) to rebuild an off-line
cluster after I upgrade it from v7 to v9.

The question is, is there any advantage to building a cluster from scratch
and restore from DRS, so that it is built from v9 installation media rather
than from a v7 upgrade?

I recall seeing a number of bugs in the past that said something to the
effect of "...if installation was an upgrade, disk space, etc. etc...."

Can anything thing of any advantages of doing this? This will help us test
our disaster recovery process as well.

Lelio

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph

519?824?4120 Ext 56354
lelio at uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140305/ece43084/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 18:07:56 -0600
From: Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>
To: Ryan Burtch <rburtch3 at gmail.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX High CPU & Memory Usage
Message-ID:
	<CACRCJOjt1DOLBaHvEnTVnLr_0yzfT9Lqwq=WTOwuurV6oAv+hQ at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

You'll want to look at Java Virtual Machine (JVM) Heap Usage in RTMT, as it
can cause a loss of all active calls and all agents to be logged out.  If
HA, it will cause a failover.

In 8.5SU3 and lower the Heap is only 256MB.  In later versions it was
doubled to 512MB.


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Ryan Burtch <rburtch3 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Has anyone seen a UCCX box so heavily used before?  See Screen shot.
>
> [image: Inline image 2]
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Ryan Burtch
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140305/acfeffba/
attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 136357 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140305/acfeffba/
attachment-0001.png>

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 19:11:59 -0500 (EST)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
To: "Madziarczyk, Jonathan" <jmad at cityofevanston.org>
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after
	upgrade	from v7 to v9?
Message-ID: <CF0F6FF2-CD4F-4FA9-882B-6FD3B35A7EEA at uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

We have one ATA. The one that is SIP. 187 I think. 

Have experienced problems with ATAs?

Sent from my iPhone

On 2014-03-05, at 3:31 PM, "Madziarczyk, Jonathan" <jmad at cityofevanston.org>
wrote:

> Yes, I believe the aligned partitions issue is VMware specific.
>  
> I don?t know what Cisco has to say about it, but I always feel better
knowing the install was direct from a fresh 9 install rather than a 7->9
upgrade.  Since the DRS backup and restore from an upgraded 9x onto a fresh
9x is acceptable in the Jump Upgrade in VMware I don?t see a problem with it
on the physical side.
>  
> On a side note, are you using any ATAs?
>  
>  
>  
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf 
> Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:44 PM
> To: Dennis Heim
> Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after
upgrade from v7 to v9?
>  
> Thanks Dennis. I  believe that 'aligned partitions' are a VM issue only? I
am currently on MCS (HP equiv) servers.
> 
> Lelio
> 
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications 
> Services (CCS) University of Guelph
> 
> 519?824?4120 Ext 56354
> lelio at uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 
> 2W1
>  
> From: "Dennis Heim" <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "cisco-voip voyp list" 
> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2014 1:37:24 PM
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after
upgrade        from v7 to v9?
> 
> Aligned partitions.
>  
> Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration) World Wide 
> Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814
>  
> PS Engineering:  Innovate & Ignite.
>  
>  
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf 
> Of Lelio Fulgenzi
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 10:56 AM
> To: cisco-voip voyp list
> Subject: [cisco-voip] should I rebuild cluster from scratch after upgrade
from v7 to v9?
>  
> 
> I have an opportunity (maybe, if time permits) to rebuild an off-line
cluster after I upgrade it from v7 to v9.
> 
> The question is, is there any advantage to building a cluster from scratch
and restore from DRS, so that it is built from v9 installation media rather
than from a v7 upgrade?
> 
> I recall seeing a number of bugs in the past that said something to the
effect of "...if installation was an upgrade, disk space, etc. etc...."
> 
> Can anything thing of any advantages of doing this? This will help us test
our disaster recovery process as well.
> 
> Lelio
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications 
> Services (CCS) University of Guelph
> 
> 519?824?4120 Ext 56354
> lelio at uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 
> 2W1
>  
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140305/3683a505/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 18:12:06 -0600
From: Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Directory URI in LDAP sync
Message-ID:
	<CACRCJOhK1vHggFVGpPwEsaJFohM6WHNTC=ic4Nw9O8jat-unJA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

For what it's worth, in CUCM 10, you can change LDAP directory field
mappings on the fly.  I.e., No more delete then re-add.


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

>
> Just following up on this Erick...
>
> After upgrading from v7 to v9, the Directory URI field is blank as you 
> suggest. I thought I could simply add another host in the existing 
> relationship, but that does not work. It looks like I have to create a 
> new directory relationship.
>
> Is it dangerous to create two directory relationships to the same 
> active directory source?
>
> Lelio
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
>
> Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph
>
> 519?824?4120 Ext 56354
> lelio at uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 
> 2W1
>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Erick B." <erickbee at gmail.com>
> *To: *"Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> *Cc: *"cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> *Sent: *Monday, November 18, 2013 2:46:57 PM
>
> *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] Directory URI in LDAP sync
>
> After upgrade from 8.x to 9.x, the field is not mapped to LDAP 
> attribute (is blank). You need to add new LDAP directory entry to get 
> that field mapped or go under Call Routing -> Directory Number and 
> Directory URI and set each DN and Directory URI setting there.
>
> The SIP URI is used for telepresence mainly so people call you at 
> userid at domainname.com from a video device.
>
> Still learning this...
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>wrote:
>
>> Can anyone comment/elaborate on what the Directory URI is used for in 
>> the LDAP sync setup screen in v9? It's set to 
>> "msRTCSIP-primaryuseraddress" by default. Unfortunately it's not 
>> modifiable after the relationship is setup and I'm not sure what to set
it to.
>>
>> I'll also have to see what value it takes during an upgrade
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/9_0_1/ccmcfg
>> /CUCM_BK_CDF59AFB_00_admin-guide_chapter_01100.html#CUCM_RF_LE051F5C_
>> 00
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140305/1b2b2233/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 00:37:53 +0000
From: Dana Tong <Dana_Tong at bridgepoint.com.au>
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)"
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] FAX and ITSP SIP Trunks and CUBE
Message-ID:
	<F70E081B078BC5408CF74D42B09E7C6604CF7791 at SVEXCBNE01.bpc.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Good morning all,

So I have a pair of CUBE with SIP trunks to an ITSP. They are hard set to
use pass-through G711alaw (Aus) and also explicitly set on each dial-peer
with "fax rate disabled" as well.

I seem to be able to send some FAXes ok back to my office along with some
other machines at another company. I cannot however send to Telstra Test FAX
and cannot RECEIVE FAX.

The FAX is connect to a SCCP controlled VG224.

Does anyone have any troubleshooting tips?

I have the "debug ccsip messages" on the CUBE along with "debug voip ccapi"
and "debug voice rtp session named-event".

Cheers
Dana

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140306/260da828/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 11
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 22:12:20 -0500
From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com>
To: Dana Tong <Dana_Tong at bridgepoint.com.au>,
	"cisco-voip at puck.nether.net (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)"
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] FAX and ITSP SIP Trunks and CUBE
Message-ID:
	
<4E38DB0A1959B04C8C83EDCF069B53ED0D5F4AE154 at USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.local>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I would look at Standards Based T.38.  EG MGCP on the VG224 , no SCCP.

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Dana Tong
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 7:38 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)
Subject: [cisco-voip] FAX and ITSP SIP Trunks and CUBE


Good morning all,

So I have a pair of CUBE with SIP trunks to an ITSP. They are hard set to
use pass-through G711alaw (Aus) and also explicitly set on each dial-peer
with ?fax rate disabled? as well.

I seem to be able to send some FAXes ok back to my office along with some
other machines at another company. I cannot however send to Telstra Test FAX
and cannot RECEIVE FAX.

The FAX is connect to a SCCP controlled VG224.

Does anyone have any troubleshooting tips?

I have the ?debug ccsip messages? on the CUBE along with ?debug voip ccapi?
and ?debug voice rtp session named-event?.

Cheers
Dana



itevomcid
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140305/221b5ad4/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 12
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 04:28:53 +0000
From: Leslie Meade <Leslie.Meade at lvs1.com>
To: "cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)"
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones
Message-ID:
	
<F64719604B4E6F41BDBB2AF38E7609F4FCF2F12D at LVSCGYEX03.longviewsystems.com>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I know that the 1st gen phones are end of life, but they should still
connect to a callmanager 10 environment ?
I have a client that wants to upgrade the system, but at this time not
willing to upgrade the handsets.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140306/c5f082f3/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 13
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 06:45:15 +0200
From: James Buchanan <james.buchanan2 at gmail.com>
To: Leslie Meade <Leslie.Meade at lvs1.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip \(cisco-voip at puck.nether.net\)"
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones
Message-ID:
	<CAOMgg-LLysz=v0nYz3dELL2v=iaoV9EX_uzrm20gtOC9K28Z=Q at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

The SRND specifies the 7900 series phones are still considered collaboration
endpoints but doesn't indicate which models are allowed.


On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Leslie Meade <Leslie.Meade at lvs1.com> wrote:

>  I know that the 1st gen phones are end of life, but they should still 
> connect to a callmanager 10 environment ?
>
> I have a client that wants to upgrade the system, but at this time not 
> willing to upgrade the handsets.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140306/f97ef344/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 14
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 08:48:53 +0000
From: Matthew Collins <mcollins at block.co.uk>
To: James Buchanan <james.buchanan2 at gmail.com>, Leslie Meade
	<Leslie.Meade at lvs1.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip \(cisco-voip at puck.nether.net\)"
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones
Message-ID:
	
<1D89CCC3241F774EA55C1FCF4564973A10381277 at BSMAIL001.blocksolutions.local>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Leslie,

Below is a screen shot from the insert 79XX phone page from 10.0.(1)

[cid:image001.jpg at 01CF3918.E5FFD220]

Regards

Matthew

? BLOCK ?
Cisco Global EMEAR Partner of the Year 2013

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
James Buchanan
Sent: 06 March 2014 04:45
To: Leslie Meade
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones

The SRND specifies the 7900 series phones are still considered collaboration
endpoints but doesn't indicate which models are allowed.

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Leslie Meade
<Leslie.Meade at lvs1.com<mailto:Leslie.Meade at lvs1.com>> wrote:
I know that the 1st gen phones are end of life, but they should still
connect to a callmanager 10 environment ?
I have a client that wants to upgrade the system, but at this time not
willing to upgrade the handsets.

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140306/16d84f7a/
attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 29587 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140306/16d84f7a/
attachment-0001.jpg>

------------------------------

Message: 15
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 07:13:05 -0500
From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com>
To: Matthew Collins <mcollins at block.co.uk>, James Buchanan
	<james.buchanan2 at gmail.com>, Leslie Meade <Leslie.Meade at lvs1.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip \(cisco-voip at puck.nether.net\)"
	<cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones
Message-ID:
	
<4E38DB0A1959B04C8C83EDCF069B53ED0D5F4AE19A at USISPCLEXDB01.na.didata.local>
	
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Do they have any VIP12 and VIP30s?

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Matthew Collins
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 3:49 AM
To: James Buchanan; Leslie Meade
Cc: cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones


Hi Leslie,

Below is a screen shot from the insert 79XX phone page from 10.0.(1)

[cid:image001.jpg at 01CF390B.84FEAC60]

Regards

Matthew

? BLOCK ?
Cisco Global EMEAR Partner of the Year 2013

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
James Buchanan
Sent: 06 March 2014 04:45
To: Leslie Meade
Cc: cisco-voip
(cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>)
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones

The SRND specifies the 7900 series phones are still considered collaboration
endpoints but doesn't indicate which models are allowed.

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Leslie Meade
<Leslie.Meade at lvs1.com<mailto:Leslie.Meade at lvs1.com>> wrote:
I know that the 1st gen phones are end of life, but they should still
connect to a callmanager 10 environment ?
I have a client that wants to upgrade the system, but at this time not
willing to upgrade the handsets.

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



itevomcid
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140306/3532d7d6/
attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 29587 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140306/3532d7d6/
attachment-0001.jpg>

------------------------------

Message: 16
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 13:56:59 +0000
From: Daniel Pagan <dpagan at fidelus.com>
To: Leslie Meade <Leslie.Meade at lvs1.com>, "cisco-voip
	(cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones
Message-ID:
	<A4F4BEEAD515F947AC82D086A78C70F6609895FA at NYC-EXCH-MB01.fidelus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

You can use the following tool to view IP phone compatibility with a
selected version of CUCM:
http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/vtgsca/VTGServlet

The required firmware is listed beside each supported phone model.

Hope this helps.

- Daniel

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Leslie Meade
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 11:29 PM
To: cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM 10 Phones

I know that the 1st gen phones are end of life, but they should still
connect to a callmanager 10 environment ?
I have a client that wants to upgrade the system, but at this time not
willing to upgrade the handsets.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140306/583bb56f/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


------------------------------

End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 125, Issue 5
******************************************

More information about the cisco-voip mailing list