[cisco-voip] so I was wrong on the documentation is wrong

[Aaron Daniels - Lists]

Don't know about 10, but in 9.x it was all dependant on where you pointed the client. 
cuplogin - xml
cisco-uds - service profile

Aaron


Send from my Samsung GALAXY S4 MINI on the Telstra Mobile network

-------- Original message --------
From: Ted Nugent <tednugent73 at gmail.com> 
Date: 16/05/2014  5:47 AM  (GMT+10:00) 
To: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com> 
Cc: "cisco-voip (cisco-voip at puck.nether.net)" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] so I was wrong on the documentation is wrong 
 
Last time I setup IM&P for 9.1 the xml file didn't appear to have any effect and Jabber was pulling everything from the Service Profile. I even got TAC engaged and he agreed it didn't appear to be doing anything at least for the info we were trying to map. So that may be accurate.


On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com> wrote:
CUCM 10.0.1 and IMP 10.0.01

 

Which wins?

    The Jabber-config.xml  or the Service Profile?

 

I’ve heard different feedback from various TAC engineers.

 

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/jabber/Windows/9_7/JABW_BK_C4C679C9_00_cisco-jabber-for-windows-97.pdf

 

Note: In instances where a Service Profile and the configuration file are present, settings in the Service Profile

take priority.


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140516/0f4295c2/attachment.html>