[cisco-voip] dspfarm profile 1 conference video homogenous

[Brian Meade]

Jason,

The non-video phones should be able to use a video conference bridge but it
will use up DSP resources really fast.  I'd suggest having the separate
audio-only dspfarm profile if possible.  The non-video phones will prefer a
non-video conference bridge by default as part of the Intelligent Bridge
Selection feature.

Brian


On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com> wrote:

> Customer is moving from 2811/PVDM2s the 2911/PVD3/15.2.  Customer has mix
> of 7965 and 9971 video phones.
>
>
>
> I am planning the PVDM3-128/256/sDSPs need in each 2911.
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/admin/configuration/guide/cmeadm/cmevconf.html#pgfId-1055244
> <<this running-config is for CME but applies to CUCM as well
>
>
>
> They will have a mix of 9971 video/audio and  7965 audio conference using
> Cisco IOS Homogenous Video Conferences.
>
>
>
> Is it necessary in the router and CUCM to configure both of these dspfarm
> profiles or will the video do voice-only calls too?
>
>
>
> dspfarm profile 1 conference video homogenous
>
> codec g729r8
>
> codec g711ulaw
>
> codec h264 vga
>
> max conference-participants 4
>
> max session 6
>
> associate application SCCP
>
> no shut
>
> !
>
> dspfarm profile 2 conference
>
> codec g729r8
>
> codec g711ulaw
>
> max session 6
>
> associate application SCCP
>
> no shut
>
>
>
> In short if I only configure profile 1 is that fine? Can it do both audio
> and video conferneces, say if only 7965 endpoints us it, then it would be
> used for audio only?  Or does it have to be a video to for that profile?
>
>
>
> Do I even need to configure profile 2?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140528/af22599a/attachment.html>