[cisco-voip] External Phone Number Mask Question

[Anthony Holloway]

There is the ability to use a translation pattern to route next hop by
calling number, and then you can transform the calling number at the
translation pattern level.  I'm not sure if that's helpful or not, but
wanted you to know about it.


On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Adam Piasecki <apiasecki at midatlanticbb.com>
wrote:

> Yup, 8.6, thanks this is probably going be fine for now, Unfortunately
> it’s applied to the trunk and I have some route patterns that require
> different caller IDs.  For example some route patterns would include an
> area code while others don’t for the caller id. I didn’t really explain
> that part in my first message but this is definitely better then what I
> had.
>
>
>
> It would be awesome if they expanded transformation patterns to include
> matching a route pattern.
>
>
>
> Thanks!,
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> *From:* avholloway at gmail.com [mailto:avholloway at gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Anthony
> Holloway
> *Sent:* Friday, May 30, 2014 9:09 AM
> *To:* Adam Piasecki
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] External Phone Number Mask Question
>
>
>
> You could use outbound calling party transformations on the trunks. You
> can be specific about which calling parties transform to what numbers as
> well as supplying a default for the trunk.
>
>
>
> Think of these transformations as being more powerful, because they are
> conditionally transforming numbers as opposed to transforming all numbers
> blindly.
>
>
>
> E.g., The implicit transformation of a RP/RL/RG will transform any and all
> numbers. Using an explicit calling party transformation pattern allows you
> to say: "if the calling number is 2001 then transform it to 8888; otherwise
> transform it to 7777" by way of using patterns to match numbers for which
> you wish to apply your transformations.
>
>
>
> Hopefully you're on a CUCM version which supports Xforms.
>
> On Thursday, May 29, 2014, Adam Piasecki <apiasecki at midatlanticbb.com>
> wrote:
>
> I have two trunks, the caller ID on each trunk needs to be different. All
> phones will have the same caller ID depending on the trunk they choose.
> This is easily enough done in the route patterns.
>
>
>
> Now I have a case where one phone has a DID and needs it’s caller ID to be
> different then all the other. So I set the External Phone mask in the
> phone. but the route patterns are overwriting it. It will have the same
> caller ID for both trunks.
>
>
>
> I thought checking the box “Use Calling Party's External Phone Number
> Mask” in the route pattern would use the phones external phone mask as a
> precedence first, and then if the phone didn’t have a external phone number
> mask it would default to what is set in the route pattern. If CUCM doesn’t
> have this feature, is there any reason why it couldn’t?
>
>
>
> The only solution I have found is to create separate partitions, calling
> search spaces, and route patterns for just this one phone.
>
>
>
> I can’t put the external phone number mask in all the phones because of
> the 1st requirement of different caller IDs for each trunk.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140530/1d2ec98f/attachment.html>