[cisco-voip] masking internal caller ID?

[Brian Meade]

That's expected behavior.  I would send the calls through a translation
pattern to updating the calling number instead.

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Countryman, Edward <
Edward.Countryman at presencehealth.org> wrote:

>  We need to “hide” or change the extension number of a small group of
> cisco phones when they are dialing internally (4 digits) to another phone.
>
>
>
> Our thought was to use a calling party transformation pattern for this,
> which appears to work fine when alerting and connected to the called number.
>
>
>
> However, the call history directory on the receiving phone (the one that
> see’s the transformed calling number not the real calling number) reflects
> the real number.
>
>
>
> This doesn’t seem to make sense and defeats the whole purpose. what are we
> missing??
>
>
>
> Do you know of a better way to approach this request?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20140930/60bb48a2/attachment.html>