[cisco-voip] Sip design question

[Charles Goldsmith]

Per this: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube_mgmt/configuration/xe-3s/cube-mgmt-xe-3s-book/voi-stateful-switchover.html
it says it is on 3.2 or later, but it does have a list of caveats,
perhaps that is what I was thinking about.

Sorry for the false alarm.



On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:33 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
> Charles,
>
> I guess that is a better place to start; I may be going down this road in a
> near future. I have been reading
> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube/configuration/cube-book/voi-cube-high-availability.html#concept_5013D60352C446769D62736C8CDE87E8
> which seems to suggest that L2 box to box is possible on the 4451.
>
> Are you saying it is not?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ryan
>
>> From: wokka at justfamily.org
>> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:59:34 -0600
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sip design question
>> To: ryanhuff at outlook.com
>> CC: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
>>
>> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought cube-ha was missing from
>> the code on these? same as the ASR's since they are all running
>> ios-xe.
>>
>> I have not tested it myself, just doing a lot of reading in
>> preparation of deploying these.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
>> > I have a pair of cubes on 4000 series ISRs. I want to do cube-ha on the
>> > ccm
>> > facing side and the itsp facing side.
>> >
>> > 1.) Am I better off just doing HSRP on both sides (which is 70% of
>> > cube-ha
>> > anyway) or is it practical to do the connected call failover portion?
>> >
>> > 2.) If I include the connected call failover, which side would I do that
>> > one, 1 or both (ccm facing side or itsp facing side)?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Ryan
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >