[cisco-voip] Sip design question

[Ryan Huff]

Charles,

I guess that is a better place to start; I may be going down this road in a near future. I have been reading http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube/configuration/cube-book/voi-cube-high-availability.html#concept_5013D60352C446769D62736C8CDE87E8 which seems to suggest that L2 box to box is possible on the 4451.

Are you saying it is not?

Thanks,

Ryan

> From: wokka at justfamily.org
> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:59:34 -0600
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sip design question
> To: ryanhuff at outlook.com
> CC: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> 
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought cube-ha was missing from
> the code on these?  same as the ASR's since they are all running
> ios-xe.
> 
> I have not tested it myself, just doing a lot of reading in
> preparation of deploying these.
> 
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
> > I have a pair of cubes on 4000 series ISRs. I want to do cube-ha on the ccm
> > facing side and the itsp facing side.
> >
> > 1.) Am I better off just doing HSRP on both sides (which is 70% of cube-ha
> > anyway) or is it practical to do the connected call failover portion?
> >
> > 2.) If I include the connected call failover,  which side would I do that
> > one, 1 or both (ccm facing side or itsp facing side)?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ryan
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150401/f42d8f8d/attachment.html>