[cisco-voip] CUCM Native Presence (BLF/SD) populating Directories / Call Lists
Justin Steinberg
jsteinberg at gmail.com
Wed Dec 2 11:39:19 EST 2015
BLFs don't generate missed call alerts. only DNs. It might be helpful
to get a third phone (or IP Communicator) so you don't have to 'dial
itself', that might be making things a little confusing to understand the
various behaviors.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Jeffrey Girard <jeffrey.girard at girardinc.com
> wrote:
> Nate –
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
>
>
> Yes, see below
>
>
>
> . Finally, I set the Enterprise Parameter “BLF for Call
> Lists” to enabled.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* NateCCIE [mailto:nateccie at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 1, 2015 8:29 PM
> *To:* Jeffrey Girard; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* RE: [cisco-voip] CUCM Native Presence (BLF/SD) populating
> Directories / Call Lists
>
>
>
> Do you have the enterprise parameter “BLF for call lists” enabled?
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>] *On Behalf Of *Jeffrey Girard
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 01, 2015 6:20 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] CUCM Native Presence (BLF/SD) populating
> Directories / Call Lists
>
>
>
> All –
>
> I have been lurking on this list for quite a while as I
> continue to hone my collaboration skills.
>
>
>
> CAVEAT: This is not a production system and is not for
> any customer. This is my lab as I continue to try to learn.
>
>
>
> CUCM v9
>
>
>
> Desired endstate: Populate the Missed Calls with CUCM Native Presence /
> Speed Dial information.
>
>
>
> What I have configured:
>
>
>
> 2 phones, both 7962s. Both have a BLF/SD pointing to the
> other. One DN is 3001 and the other DN is 3002. BLF/SDs work fine.
> Created a single partition that holds all the phones PT_Internal and a
> single CSS that holds the partition CSS_Internal. On each of the 7962s, I
> set the line SUBSCRIBE CSS to CSS_Internal. Finally, I set the Enterprise
> Parameter “BLF for Call Lists” to enabled.
>
>
>
> However, if I go offhook on 3002 and dial itself, I see
> the BLF light on 3001. If I don’t answer the call and then I check the
> missed calls for 3001, I expect to see an entry for 3002. However, nothing
> shows. If I go offhook on 3002, call 3001, let it ring and do not answer,
> that missed call shows up as it should.
>
>
>
> My Directories are populated with information from when I
> park calls, directed parks, but not the missed call tied to the BLF.
>
>
>
> Is this the expected behavior? Am I expecting to see
> something (this missed call from 3002) that should not be there by design?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151202/8742e7a2/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list