[cisco-voip] Collab summit keynote simulcast on now...

[Erick Bergquist]

Spot on Dennis.

Next thing to kill off is voicemail. :)  would rather have a call just be
transcribed to email, a IM, or sparked instead of a wav file left. I know
speech view can do the transcription.


On Wednesday, December 9, 2015, Heim, Dennis <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com> wrote:

> Since I have been doing this for 10+ years, it seems that all the complex
> telephony features become less and less important. It seems that a single
> line per user is “good enough.” Lync has been pushing a good enough mantra
> for some time. I think for most users the call coverage of ring my phone,
> and other devices then go to voicemail.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net');>] *On
> Behalf Of *Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 08, 2015 5:29 PM
> *To:* Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bmeade90 at vt.edu');>>
> *Cc:* cisco-voip voyp list <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip at puck.nether.net');>>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Collab summit keynote simulcast on now...
>
>
>
>
>
> Key point is traditional. Cisco has said on more than one occasion
> (officially or unofficially) that feature parity with the pbx is no longer
> their focus. I twitch a little less each time someone mentions forwarding
> non-primary lines (sorry Ed and Scott, you'll need to find new
> entertainment) as time goes on.
>
>
>
> Just a cell phone companies have trained us into thinking cell coverage
> and clarity is "good enough", we'll find that with features going forward.
>
>
>
> It certainly seems like they've put a lot of thought into it this time
> around. Very little had me scratching my head saying why.
>
>
>
> Well, except for the fact that I couldn't watch on my iPad! Ugh! Apple
> this. Apple that. Mobile device this. Mobile device that. Look what we can
> do.
>
>
>
> The price point was interesting as well.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Dec 8, 2015, at 4:17 PM, Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bmeade90 at vt.edu');>> wrote:
>
> What did everyone think?  Seems fairly polished but I'm sure definitely
> missing a ton of traditional telephony features.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Abhiram Kramadhati (akramadh) <
> akramadh at cisco.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','akramadh at cisco.com');>>
> wrote:
>
> https://communities.cisco.com/community/technology/collaboration/collaborat
> ion_virtual_experience
>
>
> On 08/12/15, 10:38 PM, "cisco-voip on behalf of Lelio Fulgenzi"
>
> <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net');> on
> behalf of lelio at uoguelph.ca
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','lelio at uoguelph.ca');>> wrote:
>
> >
> >Head on over to the collab user group pages for a link to the simulcast.
> >
> >Sent from my iPhone
> >_______________________________________________
> >cisco-voip mailing list
> >cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip at puck.nether.net');>
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip at puck.nether.net');>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20151209/5abaa89b/attachment.html>