[cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?

Fri Feb 13 11:55:20 EST 2015

Ok so I wasnt crazy when I couldn't get screen sharing working with WebEx
:) yes that seems like a critical fail to me

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015, 11:40 AM Heim, Dennis <Dennis.Heim at wwt.com> wrote:

>  I find the device to overall be nice. However, there are a few things
> that limit it from becoming totally persuasive from an adoption perspective:
>
> 1.       SIP URI click to call opens an email. From working with TAC this
> is an Android feature.
>
> 2.       No screen sharing in Webex.
>
> 3.       Screensharing is possible with CMR, but requires dialing in via
> SIP-URI.
>
> 4.       Somewhere along the way it was redial or another function, it
> would drop the right hand side of a SIP-URI.
>
> 5.       No MRA, but obviously that is top of mind for feature additions,
> I am sure.
>
>
>
> When wearing my normal user hat: #1, and #2 jump out at me as critical
> misses. Despite those, I love the DX80. The DX70/80 really pushes the
> telepresence experience down to the desktop. I love the fact in a TP call I
> can move the video screens around by dragging or just tap twice and switch
> between video and presentation. In the past month that I have had my DX, I
> have become a video snob, and groan when a meeting isn’t a TP call.
>
>
>
> The DX pays for itself once it has prevented 5 days of travel or less.
> There is no competitive advantage or anything strategic about jumping on an
> airplane.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)*
>
> World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
>
> [image: twitter] <https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
>
> [image: chat][image: Phone] <+13142121814>[image: video]
>
> "Innovation happens on project squared" -- http://www.projectsquared.com
>
>
>
> *Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room
> <https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Sent:* Friday, February 13, 2015 11:19 AM
> *To:* Scott Voll
> *Cc:* Cisco VOIP
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?
>
>
>
> Do these phones use CDP/VoiceVLAN settings? Or are they simply a network
> device?
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
> University of Guelph
>
> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
> lelio at uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> *To: *"Ed Leatherman" <ealeatherman at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *"Cisco VOIP" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> *Sent: *Friday, February 13, 2015 10:06:30 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] DX70/80 thoughts?
>
> We have just purchased 4 of them.  We have large conference rooms in our
> larger sites and use a TV and a Polycom HD unit.  But in our smaller sites
> (under 20 employees) these units made a lot of sense for their small
> conference room size and that typically only one or two people would be in,
> at a time.
>
>
>
> We will see if some of our Regional Managers end up with one as a second
> monitor at there desk.  But that would be, due to the fact that they do a
> lot of video conferencing, and burn up a conference room that multiple
> people could use for meetings.
>
>
>
> Only time will tell.
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>  Anyone have these deployed to actually end-users? Thoughts or opinions?
>
>
>
> I have a DX80 on loan, after i got over the "This is pretty cool" after
> initially getting it setup, I'm trying to figure out if/where it would be
> useful here (edu) at the steepish price point. We have some disability
> services groups that are using video now, price tag is probably out of
> their budget though.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Ed Leatherman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150213/78e6305b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3876 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150213/78e6305b/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1391 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150213/78e6305b/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3876 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150213/78e6305b/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1292 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150213/78e6305b/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1389 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150213/78e6305b/attachment-0004.png>