[cisco-voip] to "dspfarm" or not?

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

My voice gateways currently have the following setup: 


! 
voice-card 0 
dspfarm 
dsp services dspfarm 
! 


Now, from what I've read, the "dspfarm" command is used to invoke/enable DSP Sharing, which is strongly discouraged. And is typically used when sharing DSPs across voice cards and only for TDM ports. 


In my case, I have only VWIC3s along with an ISM running CUE installed in slot 0, the same as the DSPs (see below). 


>From what I gather, I don't need and should remove the "dspfarm" command from my "voice-card 0" config. 


Is this correct? 






NAME: "VWIC3-4MFT-T1/E1 - 4-Port RJ-48 Multiflex Trunk - T1/E1 on Slot 0 SubSlot 0", DESCR: "VWIC3-4MFT-T1/E1 - 4-Port RJ-48 Multiflex Trunk - T1/E1" 
PID: VWIC3-4MFT-T1/E1 , VID: V01 , SN: <snip> 



NAME: "PVDM3 DSP DIMM with 64 Channels on Slot 0 SubSlot 4", DESCR: "PVDM3 DSP DIMM with 64 Channels" 
PID: PVDM3-64 , VID: V01 , SN: <snip> 



NAME: "Internal Services Module with Services Ready Engine on Slot 0", DESCR: "Internal Services Module with Services Ready Engine" 
PID: ISM-SRE-300-K9 , VID: V02 , SN: <snip> 





--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure 
Computing and Communications Services (CCS) 
University of Guelph 

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 
lelio at uoguelph.ca 
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs 
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building 
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150226/9f7dc4e0/attachment.html>