[cisco-voip] to "dspfarm" or not?

[Jason Aarons (AM)]

I’ve never removed it, and never had an issue with it ☺

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 1:17 PM
To: Cisco VOIP
Subject: [cisco-voip] to "dspfarm" or not?



My voice gateways currently have the following setup:

!
voice-card 0
 dspfarm
 dsp services dspfarm
!

Now, from what I've read, the "dspfarm" command is used to invoke/enable DSP Sharing, which is strongly discouraged. And is typically used when sharing DSPs across voice cards and only for TDM ports.

In my case, I have only VWIC3s along with an ISM running CUE installed in slot 0, the same as the DSPs (see below).

From what I gather, I don't need and should remove the "dspfarm" command from my "voice-card 0" config.

Is this correct?

________________________________
NAME: "VWIC3-4MFT-T1/E1 - 4-Port RJ-48 Multiflex Trunk - T1/E1 on Slot 0 SubSlot 0", DESCR: "VWIC3-4MFT-T1/E1 - 4-Port RJ-48 Multiflex Trunk - T1/E1"
PID: VWIC3-4MFT-T1/E1  , VID: V01 , SN: <snip>

NAME: "PVDM3 DSP DIMM with 64 Channels on Slot 0 SubSlot 4", DESCR: "PVDM3 DSP DIMM with 64 Channels"
PID: PVDM3-64          , VID: V01 , SN: <snip>

NAME: "Internal Services Module with Services Ready Engine on Slot 0", DESCR: "Internal Services Module with Services Ready Engine"
PID: ISM-SRE-300-K9    , VID: V02 , SN: <snip>
________________________________


---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
lelio at uoguelph.ca<mailto:lelio at uoguelph.ca>
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs>
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1



itevomcid
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150226/131bc50f/attachment.html>