[cisco-voip] Basic Jabber Deploy question

Ed Leatherman ealeatherman at gmail.com
Sat Jan 3 15:59:06 EST 2015


Anthony,

Thanks, I wondered at that too; after some closer inspection I found at the
top of that same section:

> Attention:
> If the client gets the _cisco-uds SRV record from a DNS query, it can
> automatically locate the user's home cluster. As a result, the client can
> also locate the Cisco Unified Communications Manager TFTP service.
> You do not need to specify your TFTP server address if you deploy the
> _cisco-uds SRV record.


The document is a bit confusing but probably because I appear to be
implementing more of a corner case scenario. Not sure how it determines
what TFTP server to use though yet. I will ask for the SRV record this week
and test things out.


Florian, Thanks for that link interesting to see what data is coming
through the UDS connection.





On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Anthony Holloway <
avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:

> What version of Jabber are you deploying?  According to the Jabber 10.5
> deployment guide, in Phone Only mode, there's only three ways to set the
> TFTP server info, none of which are DNS SRV based:
>
> *Specify TFTP Servers in Phone Mode*
> If you deploy the client in phone mode you can provide the address of the
> TFTP server as follows:
>
>    - Users manually enter the TFTP server address when they start the
>    client.
>    - You specify the TFTP server address during installation with the
>    TFTP argument.
>    - You specify the TFTP server address in the Microsoft Windows
>    registry.
>
> *Source: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/jabber/10_5/CJAB_BK_D6497E98_00_deployment-installation-guide-ciscojabber/CJAB_BK_D6497E98_00_deployment-installation-guide-ciscojabber_chapter_01001.html#CJAB_TK_SB10BC4C_00
> <http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/jabber/10_5/CJAB_BK_D6497E98_00_deployment-installation-guide-ciscojabber/CJAB_BK_D6497E98_00_deployment-installation-guide-ciscojabber_chapter_01001.html#CJAB_TK_SB10BC4C_00>*
>
> Did I miss something and phone only mode can discover TFTP via DNS SRV
> despite what the documentation states?  I've never deployed phone only
> mode, so I really don't know for sure.  I'm just going by what the doc says.
>
> On Sat Jan 03 2015 at 1:59:02 PM Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Interesting, thanks Josh. So does the client just pick a node running
>> tftp service on it's own then based on the information from UDS? The reason
>> I ask is I only have 2 nodes running that right now and its sounds like
>> either one could potentially be used by a client at any given time.
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Josh Warcop <josh at warcop.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Great question. There is a mixture of TFTP/UDS and version 9.x or 10.x
>>> determines what is used and when.
>>>
>>> If you deploy the _cisco-uds SRV record you don't need to specify TFTP
>>> because the client discovers that service via UDS from the cluster.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 10:38:57 -0500
>>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Basic Jabber Deploy question
>>> From: ealeatherman at gmail.com
>>> To: josh at warcop.com
>>> CC: kevinp at advancedtsg.com; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Josh,
>>>
>>> As a follow up question then, lets say my jabber client happens to
>>> resolve _cisco-uds to a node that isn't running TFTP service - what tells
>>> it an IP address/hostname of a TFTP node to collect the "phone"
>>> configuration, or is that delivered via the UDS connection?
>>>
>>> Kevin: CUCM v9, not running IM&P just using jabber in phone-only mode.
>>> Literally just using it as softphone/video client on some laptops.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Josh Warcop <josh at warcop.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Seems to be some confusion in this area...
>>>
>>> UDS runs on Tomcat and accessed over HTTPS and with recent versions
>>> supports SAML SSO. It's throttled so there isn't any difference pointing to
>>> subscribers or publisher first. The UDS service is a network service on
>>> each node and cannot be disabled. It has no direct dependencies on Call
>>> Manager or TFTP running on the same node.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: kevinp at advancedtsg.com
>>> To: ealeatherman at gmail.com; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 20:24:43 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Basic Jabber Deploy question
>>>
>>>
>>>  What version of CUCM/IM&P?
>>>
>>> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Ed Leatherman
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 31, 2014 3:06 PM
>>> *To:* Cisco VOIP
>>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Basic Jabber Deploy question
>>>
>>>  Hello,
>>>
>>>  I'm working on a project to deploy jabber in a limited roll-out as
>>> phone-only mode for a specific application. I'm interested in using srv
>>> records as it looks like it might be easier for end-user/students to sign
>>> into the client, so my question is related to that. I see that the
>>> _cisco-uds record is used for the client to find call manager; does this
>>> srv need to point to the publisher node, TFTP node, or CM node(s)? If not
>>> the TFTP node, how does the client know where pull it's configuration from
>>> once it has authenticated?
>>>
>>>  I have jabber working OK manually just by configuring the client - I'm
>>> just looking for ease-of-use here for the students and staff that will be
>>> using it.
>>>
>>>  Thanks for any clarification, most of the documents are centered
>>> around IM&P which isn't what i'm after right now.
>>>
>>>  Happy New Year!
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>>  Ed Leatherman
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/
>>> mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ed Leatherman
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ed Leatherman
>>  _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>


-- 
Ed Leatherman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150103/71d2cabd/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list