[cisco-voip] Transcoding question
Daniel Pagan
dpagan at fidelus.com
Mon Mar 16 21:15:05 EDT 2015
For clarity, by “higher bandwidth codec” I meant to say higher bit-rate codec, or codec of higher bandwidth consumption.
- Dan
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Daniel Pagan
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 9:08 PM
To: Ryan Huff; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Transcoding question
Hey Ryan how’s it going? Transcoder allocated by CUCM comes from the side using a higher bandwidth codec, regardless if it’s the calling or called party, with the intention to avoid streaming a high bandwidth consuming codec over a WAN connection – keeping it local to the LAN. Of course, this isn’t always true, such as due to a local transcoding resource being entirely nonexistent or a misconfiguration of the MRG/MRGLs.
Hope this helps answer your question.
- Dan
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 8:11 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Transcoding question
When xcoding is required in the call setup, which side is transcoded? The called party or the calling party?
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150317/637aeb9e/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list