[cisco-voip] Transcoding question

[Ryan Huff]

Thanks Dainel! I probably knew that at some point,  but I couldn't remember for the life of me!  Makes total sense.

Thanks,

Ryan

-------- Original Message --------
From: Daniel Pagan <dpagan at fidelus.com>
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 09:16 PM
To: Daniel Pagan <dpagan at fidelus.com>,Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com>,cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Transcoding question

>For clarity, by “higher bandwidth codec” I meant to say higher bit-rate codec, or codec of higher bandwidth consumption.
>
>- Dan
>
>From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Daniel Pagan
>Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 9:08 PM
>To: Ryan Huff; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Transcoding question
>
>Hey Ryan how’s it going? Transcoder allocated by CUCM comes from the side using a higher bandwidth codec, regardless if it’s the calling or called party, with the intention to avoid streaming a high bandwidth consuming codec over a WAN connection – keeping it local to the LAN. Of course, this isn’t always true, such as due to a local transcoding resource being entirely nonexistent or a misconfiguration of the MRG/MRGLs.
>
>Hope this helps answer your question.
>
>- Dan
>
>From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff
>Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 8:11 PM
>To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>Subject: [cisco-voip] Transcoding question
>
>
>When xcoding is required in the call setup, which side is transcoded? The called party or the calling party?
>
>Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150316/3d8014a6/attachment.html>