[cisco-voip] CUBE across VRFs

Roger Wiklund roger.wiklund at gmail.com
Tue Mar 17 17:29:08 EDT 2015


Most providers are using SBCs facing the customer. Verizon for example
has two /25, first for SIP and second for RTP. Just point a static
route to them on the outside interface, then the default route towards
the inside interface.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Matthew Loraditch
<MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
> I’ve seen it come two ways, riding your same MPLS circuit, in which case if
> you have a dedicated VG you just default route that to your MPLS router and
> there you go.
>
>
>
> The other way is like you say and I’ve done that with at&t and I didn’t have
> to route with them, they NAT’d everything on their side to me. So I just
> routed their couple SBC IPs/Subnets across that handoff and my default still
> goes into my LAN.
>
>
>
> I’m sure there are other ways as well.
>
>
>
> Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
> Network Engineer
> Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
>
> Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | G+
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Norton, Mike
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 5:05 PM
> To: Erick
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE across VRFs
>
>
>
> What I’m failing to understand is... if I set the CUBE’s default route to be
> my router on my network, then how will CUBE be able to reach the SIP
> provider’s call servers on the SIP provider’s network? It seems like I will
> need a routing protocol on whichever side of the CUBE doesn’t get a default
> route. Is that a normal requirement?
>
>
>
> Just to back up a bit, I have been assuming CUBE would have two interfaces –
> one on my network, one on the SIP provider’s network. I’ve always assumed
> that this was the normal way of deploying CUBE but maybe I’m off base there
> and getting myself confused.
>
>
>
> -mn
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Erick [mailto:erickbee at gmail.com]
> Sent: February-03-15 6:50 PM
> To: Norton, Mike
> Cc: Jason Aarons (AM); cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUBE across VRFs
>
>
>
> Only one voice vrf can be defined in IOS. Global under voice service voip.
>
>
>
> Cube-SP lets you do multiple vrf's but is EoL and way different
> configuration.
>
>
>
> If you plop a cube off your router and router interface is in a vrf and your
> separate cube is on that network then it should be fine as the cube is just
> a host then .... with default route to router.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Feb 3, 2015, at 6:08 PM, "Norton, Mike" <mikenorton at pwsd76.ab.ca> wrote:
>
> Doesn’t have to be two VRFs, could be one VRF and the global route table, if
> that makes a difference. This idea is no connectivity between them, other
> than the application-layer connectivity provided by CUBE. This is
> hypothetical – I’m just trying to understand how/if this would work. I’m
> looking to plop a CUBE between my network and a SIP provider’s network
> without having to participate in routing protocol on either side.
>
>
>
> -mn
>
>
>
> From: Jason Aarons (AM) [mailto:jason.aarons at dimensiondata.com]
> Sent: February-03-15 5:02 PM
> To: Norton, Mike; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: CUBE across VRFs
>
>
>
> You have two VRFs, do they have connectivity between them?
>
>
>
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Norton, Mike
> Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 4:36 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] CUBE across VRFs
>
>
>
>
>
> Can CUBE sit across two separate VRFs? I’ve never used it, but I’m
> envisioning an ISR having a VRF-Lite with default route pointed at my
> network, and a VRF-Lite with default route pointed at the SIP provider’s
> network. I’m thinking this would be the preferred way to do it, but maybe
> I’m missing something?
>
>
>
> My Googling is dredging up a lot of really old info that I’m not sure is
> still relevant.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mike Norton
>
>
>
> itevomcid
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list