[cisco-voip] Expressway-E Public or Private Certificate?

[Anthony Holloway]

Yes, it's in the Expressway 8.5 release notes.  Thanks for confirming.

Source: Table 1, Expressway 8.5.1 Release Notes
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/expressway/release_note/Cisco-Expressway-Release-Note-X8-5-1.pdf

Oh I'll be too shy to say anything publicly, so no worries. I might come up
to you afterwards for an autograph though.  ;)

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:47 AM Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <rratliff at cisco.com>
wrote:

>  DX, 88XX, 78XX.  This should already be in the VCS docs for 8.5 so
> hopefully I’m not getting myself in trouble :)
>
>  Yes, I’m presenting the UCM security session at CLUS this year.  My
> first time presenting so be nice if you come :)
>
> -Ryan
>
>  On Mar 26, 2015, at 5:33 PM, Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu> wrote:
>
>  8800 series I believe are on the short list right now.  May even already
> have the test firmware released.
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Anthony Holloway <
> avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ryan,
>>
>> Just to be clear, by Desktop Endpoints you mean DX endpoints, correct?
>>
>>  PS I see you're presenting at CLUS.  Can't wait to attend your
>> session(s)!
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:01 PM Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <
>> rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is somewhat optional today with TC endpoints and Jabber only
>>> supporting MRA.  It will become mandatory when desktop endpoints start
>>> supporting MRA in the very near future.
>>>
>>> -Ryan
>>>
>>>    On Mar 26, 2015, at 12:45 PM, Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>     I think it was supposed to be "that" rather than "than".
>>>      On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Anthony Holloway <
>>> avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dennis, I re-read your reply several times and I cannot make sense of
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> Are you saying that GoDaddy is the only CA which will work with
>>>> Expressway-E and MRA?
>>>>
>>>>         On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:16 AM Heim, Dennis <
>>>> Dennis.Heim at wwt.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>           Expressway should be a public certificate. Reports from
>>>>> others than goDaddy causes problems.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)*
>>>>>
>>>>> World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
>>>>>
>>>>            <image001.png> <https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
>>>>>
>>>>> <image002.png><image003.png> <+13142121814><image004.png>
>>>>>
>>>>            "Innovation happens on project squared" --
>>>>> http://www.projectsquared.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room
>>>>> <https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>*
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On
>>>>> Behalf Of *bertacco.alessandro at alice.it
>>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:12 PM
>>>>> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Expressway-E Public or Private Certificate?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>>
>>>>>    I've already read all Cisco Documentation about Certificate to load
>>>>> on the Expressway infrastructure.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For the Expressway-C I'll use private certificate signed by internal
>>>>> CA.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But what about for the Expressway-E?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Alessandro
>>>>>
>>>>          _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>>      _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150327/a8782cfa/attachment.html>