[cisco-voip] Hardware for UC

[Matthew Saskin]

For what it's worth, I would say between 80 and 90% of my clients are going
with UCS C-Series with internal storage, even in environments where they
(within the organization) already have B-series or some other blade server
+ SAN storage solution.  I would attribute this to fairly standard "turf
wars" between Network/Telephony/UC teams and Server/Storage/Data Center
teams.

Not saying it's right or wrong, just some anecdotal evidence from hundreds
of clients ranging from SMB through Fortune 500.

Matthew Saskin
msaskin at gmail.com
203-253-9571

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:

> What hardware is everyone using to upgrade there UC enviroment to?
>
> We have UCS Blades with netapp storage, but have had some limitations on
> IO (prior to the upgraded controllers) that I'm a little concerned about.
>
> I like the idea of vmotion.  But I'm thinking if it's my back side on the
> line with my UC environment, Maybe the rack mount UCS might be a better
> bet?  We (UC Team) have also been thinking about the UCS mini with storage
> blade.
>
> What our others doing?  What is Cisco suggesting these days?
>
> Thanks
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150330/7aa1d8b3/attachment.html>