[cisco-voip] Video Architecture

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

I think you raise a valid point. I've been asked (along with other members of our 'network' infrastructure team) to provide input on a number of video related issues. 

From what I gather, it's only increase. 

Considering the original architecture name, AVVID, it's always had video in there. And with the more recent move from call to communications to collaboration, it's evident that other people think the same way. ;)

I say go for it. I know I appreciate learning what others are doing with video. 

Lelio

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 17, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Does this list, being labeled "VoIP" and not "Voice", include Video in the "V", or is the "V" for Voice only?  A bit of tongue-in-cheek there, but I think you know what I mean.
> 
> With every day that passes, I feel like, as a Voice Engineer, I am being asked to know and implement Video more and more.
> 
> From CUCM taking on more of the video call control (just about 100% now, no?), to video being a part of the CCIE Collab (to some degree, don't flame me for mentioning it), the line between voice and video engineering roles is blurring.
> 
> I know there has been quite a bit of Expressway talk on here this year, but I don't think I've explicitly read a thread which was 100% focused on video technology.  What's the direction you see these two technologies heading, and should/could this list serve as both a Voice and Video discussion group?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip