[cisco-voip] Video Conference Auto attendant?
GR
grccie at gmail.com
Thu Aug 4 09:31:33 EDT 2016
While we are on the topic ....For on-prem conferencing CWMS, CMR , CMS - what are the norm these days. CWMS appears to be dead although Cisco are not officialy announcing, most of the functionality can be achieved throug the TP server (CMR on-prem solution)
CMR On-prem with conductor, TPS appeared as the preffered conf solution. With now Acano/CMS in sight it appears there will be a reshuffle again..?
So what should be the Cisco preffered conferencing solution going forward..? I have an upcoming deployment (in a month or two) with CMR on-prem (conductor, vTS, TMS suite) - should i hold for the CMS ? What exactly will be changing if we go for conductor/vTP?
Also what are you guys proposing for audio only conferencing (CWMS is kind of dead - vTP?)
Collab is changing really fast and Cisco solutions specially conf. is a web of overlapping products with no clear long term direction....
Sent from my iPhone
> On 4 Aug 2016, at 6:37 AM, Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
>
> I presume you can renew for quite a while. But you won’t get Acano which, while of course they haven’t announced the end of telepresence server/conductor, is pretty clearly where things are going. I’d imagine once Acano can do CMR Hybrid they will kill TP.
>
> Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
> Network Engineer
> Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
>
> Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | G+
>
> From: Justin Steinberg [mailto:jsteinberg at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 4:33 PM
> To: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
> Cc: Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>; Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Video Conference Auto attendant?
>
> is this a joke? how can CUWL pro just not exist anymore for people who bought it for conferencing functions.
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
> Yeah, CUWL Pro no longer exists and is now CUWL Meetings and is $100 more. You can of course upgrade your cuwl pro licenses to CUWL meetings for that $100. Your SWSS doesn’t get you a thing. The PMP is now called PMP+
> Prices are list so expect your regular discounts.
>
> So basically we are operating on a 4th iteration of Conferencing licensing in two years. Similar changes exist with the SMP licensing, now called SMP+.
>
> Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
> Network Engineer
> Direct Voice: 443.541.1518
>
> Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | G+
>
> From: Scott Voll [mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 3:00 PM
> To: Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Cc: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>; Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com>; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Video Conference Auto attendant?
>
> anyone hear anything revealed?
>
> Scott
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
> There was quite a bit of talk at Live about CMS/Acano, and CUWL pro and the [s|p]mp ELA and it sounded very much like there would be a true up of sorts to get the CMS licenses. All will be revealed after aug 1.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 25, 2016, at 5:18 PM, Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> wrote:
>
> CMS will be included in CUWL pro just like TPS is effective 8/1 with the new FY. It will also integrate with TMS for scheduling w/ 15.3 in august. Hurry up and get somebody to order the free upgrade to CUWL pro from STD before Friday and all you have to do is pay for the upgraded SWSS and get a new UCS if you don’t have hardware available.
>
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 2:34 PM
> To: Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Video Conference Auto attendant?
>
> Great...... I get to spend more money.......
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip at gmail.com> wrote:
> Take a look at the Acano/CMS product. It has IVR capability and can integrate with pretty much everything.
>
>
> On Jul 25, 2016 9:54 AM, "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
> What are others doing for video conferences?
>
> we have a Polycom RMX that we have an extension that everyone dials into. Then it asks what ID you would like to use. when everyone dials into that Conference ID, they are all apart of the same Video conference.
>
> With the Telepresence Server, how do you get that same functionality?
>
> Thanks
>
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20160804/4ef41f20/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list