[cisco-voip] [cisco-VoIP] UCCE agents on wireless IP Communicator?
Thomas LeMay
thomaslemay at comcast.net
Wed May 11 22:42:11 EDT 2016
How about Jabber? Is Jabber stable enough even though it does not support multiple lines? My thought would be no based on the same reason for CIPC.
Tom
From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Burtch
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 2:58 PM
To: Nick Barnett
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCE agents on wireless IP Communicator?
This is a terrible idea. CIPC not stable enough on wireless. Introduce VPN and this is a disaster waiting to happen.
Sincerely,
Ryan Burtch
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Nick Barnett <nicksbarnett at gmail.com> wrote:
Does anyone have any experiences running CIPC on wireless for UCCE agents? It sounds like a...um, bad idea to me. One of my customers is moving to this "design."
A cursory look at the 10.0 SRND didn't show any hits for "wired" or "wireless".
thanks,
Nick
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20160511/35b63c0d/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list