[cisco-voip] Does CCX enforce licensing?

[Ed Leatherman]

There is a license utilization hourly report in CUIC if you are running a
reasonable recent version of UCCX, which shows maximum seats used per time
period. Its under the stock reports Inbound -> System

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Ben Amick <bamick at humanarc.com> wrote:

> So realistically, I’m way overlicensed in my environment then? Right now
> we have a 1:1 relationship between agents and licenses for both QM and CCX,
> with agents working across 2 shifts.
>
> Is there any report I can run to see how many concurrent users I have at
> peak hours?
>
>
>
> *Ben Amick*
>
> Telecom Analyst
>
>
>
> *From:* James Buchanan [mailto:james.buchanan2 at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 29, 2016 9:27 AM
> *To:* Ben Amick <bamick at HumanArc.com>
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Does CCX enforce licensing?
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> UCCX enforces agent licenses by concurrently logged in agents. So, if you
> have ten licenses and ten agents or supervisors are logged in, the eleventh
> login will be rejected.
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Ben Amick <bamick at humanarc.com> wrote:
>
> I was curious about this, I know QM enforces licensing by not letting you
> toggle in users for licensing, and I know CUCM and Unity enforce licensing
> though PLM, but does UCCX enforce licensing? We’re coming up quick on our
> license cap right now and I’m debating if I should be scrambling to get
> licensing or just persist in current state while we’re evaluating upgrade
> costs.
>
>
>
> *Ben Amick*
>
> Telecom Analyst
>
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
> that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient
> or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or
> hard copy. Thank you
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/FZsS921J5xWX2pEVsj76XCQkmnSkNMV4QsCQkmnSkNPPX9J55BZVYsY-Urhhsd79EVLuWdPp3lpmawECSHIdzrBPpdJnor6TbCZpKqek6nD-LObbW8VdNDHTbFIzCejo7nKOqemeEyCJtdmXOvaxVZicHs3jq9J4TvAXTLuZXTKrKr9PCJhbcmrIlU6A_zMdMjlS67OFek7qVqlblbCqOmdyeG_jy3tyuMS2oa8yvbCNPVEV76MnWhEwdbtFkJkKpH9oQKCy0eHZ3h092g36y3UeRzrPh0vaTMFa14AroodT2Z>
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
> that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient
> or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or
> hard copy. Thank you
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


-- 
Ed Leatherman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20161129/f5bc34d3/attachment.html>