[cisco-voip] how long to let expressway updates bake

[Tim Frazee]

sitting on 8.9.2 until we go with 11.5(1)SU3, which we'll then go to .10

On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 3:16 AM, Matt Jacobson <m4ttjacobson at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Has anyone moved to X8.10.0? I heard .1 is a little further away than
> expected. I'm curious to see if anyone has taken the plunge. This
> particular cluster does not run MRA, but it does have Jabber Guest and B2B
> calls running across it with over 500 registrations on the Exp-C.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> **phew**
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>>
>> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
>>
>> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
>>
>> University of Guelph
>>
>>
>>
>> 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 <(519)%20824-4120>
>>
>> lelio at uoguelph.ca
>>
>> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
>>
>> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
>>
>> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Ryan Huff [mailto:ryanhuff at outlook.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 18, 2017 12:10 PM
>> *To:* Lelio Fulgenzi
>> *Cc:* Tim Frazee; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] how long to let expressway updates bake
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm talking about the remote screen sharing features :).
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> On Jul 18, 2017, at 12:05 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>>
>> What? Jabber MRA not working in Expressway 8.8+
>>
>>
>>
>> Wasn’t that the primary reason for expressway? Eeeeeek.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is this in the release notes?
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>>
>> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
>>
>> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
>>
>> University of Guelph
>>
>>
>>
>> 519-824-4120 Ext 56354 <(519)%20824-4120>
>>
>> lelio at uoguelph.ca
>>
>> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
>>
>> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
>>
>> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net>] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Huff
>> *Sent:* Monday, July 17, 2017 3:28 PM
>> *To:* Tim Frazee
>> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] how long to let expressway updates bake
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd personally say anything 8.8+ is good 2 go and it's mostly still just
>> the Jabber stuff that doesn't work over MRA (which is documented).
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> On Jul 17, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Tim Frazee <tfrazee at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> When I say "sit" would be how long do I let other Cisco customers find
>> any serious issues before I would hop on. Wait for the "a" revision to
>> drop. was typical back in the day. not sure if expressway had the same
>> history.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>> Not sure what you're referring to by "sit"? Are you referring to a
>> hardware burn-in of the host chassis the guest VM is running on?
>>
>> During the non-production period, is the business using it to validate
>> its configuration and usability for its specified business case? Usually,
>> once UAT (User Acceptance Testing) is completed and signed off on I would
>> kick it in to production during a scheduled window.
>>
>> For chassis burn-in, I like to see a week in the production racks.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> > On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:32 AM, Tim Frazee <tfrazee at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > new to the expressway suite and was wondering whats the average wait
>> time (if any) for new versions of expressway to sit before you consider
>> them production worthy.
>> >
>> > for ucm/cup/cuc, I usually give it no more than a month before I would
>> consider it "stable" but was interested in what this group tends to lean to.
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170801/d0d95625/attachment.html>