[cisco-voip] IP Phones + MGCP FXS + Shared Lines

[Anthony Holloway]

That seems to be it Bill.  Now, since I was looking for documentation to
support my theory that it's not supported, I do read that in my favor
(confirmation bias).  Does anyone else care to share their perspective on
what that passage might actually not be saying?

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 7:08 PM Bill Talley <btalley at gmail.com> wrote:

> Not sure if the screenshot came through... another attempt.
>
>
> ​
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 7:05 PM, Bill Talley <btalley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> How about this?  It's the closest I've seen to what you're asking about.
>>
>>
>> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/10_0_1/ccmsys/CUCM_BK_SE5FCFB6_00_cucm-system-guide-100/CUCM_BK_SE5FCFB6_00_cucm-system-guide-100_chapter_010001.html#CUCM_RF_S05975F9_00
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Anthony Holloway <
>> avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> No unfortunately, just gotta play the cards dealt on this one.
>>>
>>> Actually, I'm not interested in changing anything, I'm looking for
>>> documentation that supports what these two Cisco employee have publicly
>>> stated.  I personally will only cite sources from official documentation,
>>> and not from web forums, regardless of who posted it.  Because, at the end
>>> of the day, that employee can be wrong, and Cisco does not have to take
>>> responsibility for the infraction.  However, in documentation they do.
>>> Either they fix the documentation, or they fix the technology.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 4:00 PM Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Looks like the thread points you to sccp controlled fxs ports. I'm sure
>>>> you have your reasons for wanting MGCP. Curious what those are.
>>>>
>>>> Could you get away with ATAs?
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 16, 2017, at 1:50 AM, Anthony Holloway <
>>>> avholloway+cisco-voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have current information on whether or not MGCP FXS ports
>>>> can be on shared lines with Cisco IP Phones?
>>>>
>>>> No anecdotal or empirical evidence please.  I'm looking for documented
>>>> facts, preferably the kind that doesn't require re-reading it like 10 times
>>>> to come up with your own interpretation.
>>>>
>>>> Check out what the two Cisco Employees are saying in this thread from
>>>> 2010 (Spoiler - It's not supported)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony/shared-line-between-ip-phones-and-fxs-port-with-sccp-setup/td-p/1045431
>>>>
>>>> Are you a Cisco employee who likes to stick your neck out for internet
>>>> strangers, and also believe this to be unsupported?  Please contact me.  Or
>>>> not.  I'm not crying.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20171222/5d50d94f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mgcpsl.png
Type: image/png
Size: 294851 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20171222/5d50d94f/attachment.png>