[cisco-voip] Expressway MRA design question.

[mtarpey1 at optimum.net]

u might want to try to get a girlfriend

----- Original Message -----
From: Lelio Fulgenzi 
Date: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 11:27 am
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Expressway MRA design question.
To: "voyp list, cisco-voip" 

> we tried this and it didn't work out so well. we didn't try to 
> fix things because we were on a limited time frame. we also ran 
> into an issue where the hostname has to match the outside 
> name/certificate details as well as matching the service 
> discovery domain).
> 
> 
> so, where we initially had hostname.dept.acme.com we had to 
> modify it to servicename.servicedomain.acme.com.
> 
> 
> then, in the split view dns, you resolve 
> servicename.servicedomain.acme.com to the internal address for 
> admin, and external for connectivity from off-prem.
> 
> 
> you _might_ be able to configure the hostname as the alias and 
> configure the certificates accordingly, but like you said, it's 
> not the standard approach.
> 
> 
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
> Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
> University of Guelph
> 
> 519-824-4120 Ext 56354
> lelio at uoguelph.ca
> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: cisco-voip on behalf 
> of Nick via cisco-voip 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 11:10 AM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Expressway MRA design question.
> 
> I have a customer who doesn't want the Expressway E FQDN to be 
> put into the public DNS SRV record and wants to use an alias 
> such as an a record in the collab-edge SRV which points to the 
> public IP, I cant seem to find if this is supported or not can 
> anyone confirm if this is supported?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170214/c6d23819/attachment.html>