[cisco-voip] vg224 registered to two different Cm's

[Scott Voll]

sorry, mgcp...... did a no mgcp and mgcp.  no change

reset from CM and all registered to cmsub reset but the once on the pub
didn't.

CM shows good replication on the DB's.  it's the wierdest thing I've seen.

Scott


On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu> wrote:

> Try resetting all the ports from CUCM then maybe bounce SCCP on the VG if
> that still didn't work.
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All are in the same DP.  we just changed from IP to FQDN over the
>> weekend.  Any other thoughts?
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Jeffrey McHugh <jmchugh
>> <jmchugh at fidelus.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> Pretty sure you can assign device pools to the specific ports, different
>>> DP’s may have diff. call mgr groups
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Scott Voll
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 17, 2017 12:38 PM
>>> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] vg224 registered to two different Cm's
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> How can some ports on a VG register to the pub and some to the Sub on
>>> the same VG?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> totally confused on this one.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> CM 10.5.2 /  VG vg224-i6k9s-mz.151-4.M9.bin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170117/3040bbf2/attachment.html>