[cisco-voip] vg224 registered to two different Cm's

[Brian Meade]

Same Device Pool on all the ports?

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:

> sorry, mgcp...... did a no mgcp and mgcp.  no change
>
> reset from CM and all registered to cmsub reset but the once on the pub
> didn't.
>
> CM shows good replication on the DB's.  it's the wierdest thing I've seen.
>
> Scott
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu> wrote:
>
>> Try resetting all the ports from CUCM then maybe bounce SCCP on the VG if
>> that still didn't work.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> All are in the same DP.  we just changed from IP to FQDN over the
>>> weekend.  Any other thoughts?
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Jeffrey McHugh <jmchugh
>>> <jmchugh at fidelus.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Pretty sure you can assign device pools to the specific ports,
>>>> different DP’s may have diff. call mgr groups
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On
>>>> Behalf Of *Scott Voll
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 17, 2017 12:38 PM
>>>> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] vg224 registered to two different Cm's
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How can some ports on a VG register to the pub and some to the Sub on
>>>> the same VG?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> totally confused on this one.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> CM 10.5.2 /  VG vg224-i6k9s-mz.151-4.M9.bin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170117/18c6fe2d/attachment.html>