[cisco-voip] Call length on paging ports

Dave Goodwin dave.goodwin at december.net
Mon Sep 25 16:19:06 EDT 2017


It may be that the person performing the page and placing the paging port
on hold is in the front office and isn't within earshot of the plant floor.
I could definitely see that.

In addition to checking the options on the paging system itself, have you
considered the option of configuring the Hold Reversion Ring Duration and Hold
Reversion Notification Interval fields on the lines? In particular, either
the lines from where the undesired Hold button is taking place - or perhaps
on all lines by configuring the cluster wide service parameters by those
names. It doesn't prevent the person from pressing Hold in the first place.
And it still requires someone to (after resuming) actually end the call to
the paging port. But maybe providing the reminder that it's actually a held
call will help. Maybe a desire to avoid the hold reminder will help get the
message across to the user that they're "doing it wrong" and seek training
on how to do it. But then again they may just complain about the extra
noise and ask it to be disabled. ;-)

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Ben Amick <bamick at humanarc.com> wrote:

> Call me crazy, but wouldn’t someone in the plant hear that they put the
> paging system on hold and fix it by picking the call back up? Ryan’s
> suggest would belay it, but user training would also be a good mention.
>
>
>
> A secondary measure is to look at what you’re hooked up to. In the past
> almost all of the FXO based paging systems run through a paging adapter of
> sorts, like a Valcom. Those typically have a setting on them that you can
> set max timeout as well as on-hook detection.
>
>
>
> Ben Amick
>
> Unified Communications Analyst
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf
> Of *Ryan Huff
> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 3:37 PM
> *To:* Loren Hillukka <lchillukka at hotmail.com>
> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Call length on paging ports
>
>
>
> You might find that editing the softkey template and relocating the hold
> softkey away from the end call softkey for the connected state might be a
> solution (that way you don’t have to alter the behavior of the pots line).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Ryan
>
>
> On Sep 25, 2017, at 3:31 PM, Loren Hillukka <lchillukka at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I have a plant building with a 4351 connected to a paging system via an
> FXO port.  Site has phones connected to CUCM, gw is not MGCP.  Users at the
> plant are notorious for paging, then pressing "hold" instead of "end call"
> on the Cisco phones they page from. The plant floor then gets MOH playing
> and nobody else can page until I shut/no shut the port or they unplug the
> cable from the fxo port.
>
> Any idea if a max length of call timer can be applied only to that one fxo
> port, to disconnect any call to it after 15 seconds or so?
>
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> <http://cp.mcafee.com/d/2DRPowrhvKUOUYDsQsCXCQkmnSkNMV4QsCQkmnSkNPPX9J55BZVYsY-Urhhsd79EVLuWdPp3lpmawECSHIdzrBPpdJnor6TbCQkdvd7dzhO_R-sssd7bOb_nKnh7e8YztdOZXIZh55qWqJQmul3PWApmU6CQjq9K_nhjjpd7dQXCzATsSjDdqymoIToHMd9_7wrwCHIcfBisEeROQGmGncRAIrJaBGBPdpb5O5mUm-wamrIlU6A_zMddEFEIICMnWhEwdbtFkJkKpH9oQKCy0iQYYQg7_0zcCq8aMd42SApg8Cy1qIpQdIc6Vet2kjPD>
>
>
> Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
> that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient
> or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or
> hard copy. Thank you
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170925/eb05c1cb/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list