[cisco-voip] Route Pattern and Route list detail issue

[Brian Meade]

Is it possible matching a calling party transformation?

What does the Digit Analysis look like in the CallManager traces?

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Erick Bergquist <erickbee at gmail.com> wrote:

> I checked that and it is good.  I did a dbreplication status and it
> checked and came back with no errors.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu> wrote:
> > dbreplication working okay?
> >
> > Might want to try "utils dbreplication repair all" so it just goes
> through
> > and checks all the tables assuming you're in a good state now.
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Erick Bergquist <erickbee at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have been facing a weird route pattern and route list issue and am
> >> unable to find cause or reason why the route list is not passing along
> >> changes made at route pattern level.
> >>
> >> Call Manager version 11.0(1) SU3 -- 11.0.1.23900-5
> >>
> >>
> >> On the route pattern level I am hard setting the calling party
> >> transform mask to a specific number to be sent out for Caller ID.
> >>
> >> The route list level is default, and is not passing through the set
> >> number and calls go out with extension on phone.
> >>
> >> I have deleted the route pattern, route list, and route group and made
> >> them from scratch and same problem.  There are no transformations
> >> being done on the SIP trunk and no modifications on the trunk. The
> >> route list and trunks have been reset and saved and updated numerous
> >> times.
> >>
> >> Cisco DNA output shows the changes being done to calling party number
> >> on route pattern level and on route list detail level in DNA it shows
> >> the phone extension.
> >>
> >> I have tried changing the settings from default to Off and on on the
> >> route list detail without effect.
> >>
> >> I've never had this problem before with route pattern changes not
> >> being passed through to the destination gateway or trunk.
> >>
> >> I'm having to create extra route lists at moment to put the specific
> >> number on the calling party transform field on route list detail
> >> level. I don't really want the extra route lists though.
> >>
> >> Anyone have any ideas?
> >>
> >> Erick
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20170927/4162a886/attachment.html>