[cisco-voip] Route Pattern and Route list detail issue

[Erick Bergquist]

Brian.

No transformations configured at all.  I'm not able to recreate the
issue now like I was earlier and in past few days. Seems to have
cleared itself up.  I did find a few older route patterns with the
ISDN specific settings set and set those to default (not selected) -
that's about the only thing I changed. I'm going to keep an eye on it.
We need to set the calling party number to specific numbers for some
patterns and locations and it wasn't passing through correctly.

Erick


On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu> wrote:
> Is it possible matching a calling party transformation?
>
> What does the Digit Analysis look like in the CallManager traces?
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Erick Bergquist <erickbee at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I checked that and it is good.  I did a dbreplication status and it
>> checked and came back with no errors.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Brian Meade <bmeade90 at vt.edu> wrote:
>> > dbreplication working okay?
>> >
>> > Might want to try "utils dbreplication repair all" so it just goes
>> > through
>> > and checks all the tables assuming you're in a good state now.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Erick Bergquist <erickbee at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I have been facing a weird route pattern and route list issue and am
>> >> unable to find cause or reason why the route list is not passing along
>> >> changes made at route pattern level.
>> >>
>> >> Call Manager version 11.0(1) SU3 -- 11.0.1.23900-5
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On the route pattern level I am hard setting the calling party
>> >> transform mask to a specific number to be sent out for Caller ID.
>> >>
>> >> The route list level is default, and is not passing through the set
>> >> number and calls go out with extension on phone.
>> >>
>> >> I have deleted the route pattern, route list, and route group and made
>> >> them from scratch and same problem.  There are no transformations
>> >> being done on the SIP trunk and no modifications on the trunk. The
>> >> route list and trunks have been reset and saved and updated numerous
>> >> times.
>> >>
>> >> Cisco DNA output shows the changes being done to calling party number
>> >> on route pattern level and on route list detail level in DNA it shows
>> >> the phone extension.
>> >>
>> >> I have tried changing the settings from default to Off and on on the
>> >> route list detail without effect.
>> >>
>> >> I've never had this problem before with route pattern changes not
>> >> being passed through to the destination gateway or trunk.
>> >>
>> >> I'm having to create extra route lists at moment to put the specific
>> >> number on the calling party transform field on route list detail
>> >> level. I don't really want the extra route lists though.
>> >>
>> >> Anyone have any ideas?
>> >>
>> >> Erick
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >
>> >
>
>