[cisco-voip] e911

Wed Mar 7 16:41:03 EST 2018

This might be a good time to talk about my favorite way to enable 911.

Set the interdigit timeout to a small value, like 3-5 seconds.  Then create a 911 route pattern, and a 911! Pattern, that does not route to 911.  If the user dials 911 and stops, the call connects.  If they keep dialing which usually what happens on a miss-dial, they get whatever your 911! Pattern is configured to do, usually I like block this pattern.

-Nate

From: Bill Talley <btalley at gmail.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 2:22 PM
To: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com>
Cc: NateCCIE <nateccie at gmail.com>; Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com>; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] e911

Seems like there's two key aspects we need to be concerned with.  1) As I think Matthew is pointing out, notifications are only required if notifications are a native feature available "without improvement", i.e. add-on components.  2)  We now MUST configure direct 911 access without regard to customer complaints or PSAP complaints about accidental 911 calls.

To answer your question Matthew, I have only ever used CER and Singlewire for notifications, sorry I can't provide more feedback.

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com <mailto:MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> > wrote:

As far as I know that feature doesn’t notify anyone internally.

The part of the law I’m referring to is this:

“A person engaged in the business of installing, managing, or operating multi-line telephone systems shall, in installing, managing, or operating such a system for use in the United States, configure the system to provide a notification to a central location at the facility where the system is installed or to another person or organization regardless of location, if the system is able to be configured to provide the notification without an improvement to the hardware or software of the system.”

Matthew Loraditch

Sr. Network Engineer

p:  <tel:443.541.1518> 443.541.1518

w:  <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> www.heliontechnologies.com

 | 

e:  <mailto:MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com

 <https://facebook.com/heliontech> 

 <https://twitter.com/heliontech> 

 <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies> 

From: NateCCIE [mailto:nateccie at gmail.com <mailto:nateccie at gmail.com> ] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 3:58 PM
To: Matthew Loraditch <MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com <mailto:MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> >; 'Ryan Huff' <ryanhuff at outlook.com <mailto:ryanhuff at outlook.com> >; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] e911

Um, I thought it did.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/unified-communications/unified-communications-manager-callmanager/200452-Usage-of-Native-Emergency-Call-Routing-F.html

From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net> > On Behalf Of Matthew Loraditch
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 1:36 PM
To: Ryan Huff <ryanhuff at outlook.com <mailto:ryanhuff at outlook.com> >; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] e911

To piggy back on this, while Cisco doesn’t have emergency notifications built in, as the law mentions, and thus they are not required, does anyone know of options beyond Singlewire that they are happy with? The installs would monitor up to 1000 or so handsets but the folks that would be notified would probably be fewer than 50.

Matthew Loraditch

Sr. Network Engineer

p:  <tel:443.541.1518> 443.541.1518

w:  <http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> www.heliontechnologies.com

 | 

e:  <mailto:MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com> MLoraditch at heliontechnologies.com

 <https://facebook.com/heliontech> 

 <https://twitter.com/heliontech> 

 <https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies> 

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Huff
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 3:11 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Subject: [cisco-voip] e911

I wonder how cloud-based phone system like Cisco spark will answer this?

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/karis-law-you-compliant-edgar-salazar

Sent from my iPhone

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20180307/76ef4310/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 8404 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20180307/76ef4310/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 431 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20180307/76ef4310/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 561 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20180307/76ef4310/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 444 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20180307/76ef4310/attachment-0003.png>